Anna, I get why you didn't vote but it really means you can't complain. You didn't have to vote for Hillary or Trump. You could've voted 3rd party or even wrote in Micky Mouse. I've done that. I'm 51 and never missed a vote.
Just saw this, and I think you misread my post. I did not vote this time because I did not WANT to have a "right to complain" when my choice one.
While the above is certainly true, and while I certainly considered Gary Johnson very carefully, there are things about ALL the candidates I did not care for. I considered Micky Mouse, Santa Claus, etc., but I also considered my time on such an endeavor somewhat ludicrous. I mean, I get the issues, the need for finding alternatives, and although I was NOT looking for the perfect candidate, there is this THING (best illustrated by the Southpark episode on the topic) where society SHAMES you, or tells you that you MUST vote, and if you don't you are apathetic, and should be tarred and feathered and etc.
When a system is so deeply deeply corrupt that I could not find ONE candidate I considered "not bad enough," I have the choice to abstain from voting.
People often look at certain groups, crying 'apathy! Foul! Why not vote!" when really quite often said group genuinely feels that there is no one they WANT to vote for, and that silence is better than a ludicrous vote. Look at Obama's ability to capture an UNTAPPED market (youth) and what that did for him. Youth weren't "failing to vote" they were "failing to find a candidate they could believe in even 0.000001 percent."
Of course, they are also more susceptible to hypnotism and idealism, but that is another matter (although, Obama certainly milked that to the Nth degree) and whatever, and the results have been... interesting.
But, I believe my choice to vote (and lack of desire to complain) is as valid as any other vote. It's easy to say "But ANY vote is at least not for one or the other," it is easy to state, "But, if you have a non two party candidate who might get all the special rules and extra funding next time," you should vote and etc.
My point is, when something is as deeply flawed and unfixable as it is, well, all I can say is, "I have a right to not participate." That choice should and can be regarded as valid as ANY other choice.
Voting for Santa Claus does nothing to change or sway either party. If Gary J. had not done some of the things he did, I might have voted for him, but I could not in good conscience do so.
The day I vote, it will be for a candidate who is deserving of my vote and frankly my standards (by now) are Pretty Dang Low.
Etc,
Anna