This is the mentality we're dealing with:
"In an interview with Vox, Mitch Zeller conceded e-cigarettes are far less hazardous than tobacco cigarettes, but refused to endorse the 95 percent safety figure accepted by bodies such as Public Health England and the Royal College of Physicians.
<snip>
If I were a pack-a-day smoker who was unable or unwilling to quit, and I substituted my cigarettes for e-cigarettes, there’s no question I’d be significantly reducing my risk. But as a regulatory agency, we have to make decisions at the population level.”
[article here]
Hmm. So, harm reduction for the 20% +/- of the population that still smokes doesn't count. The children who might take up smoking doesn't count because we're going to make sure they can't get them. The rest of the population doesn't count because there is no second hand vapor to impact them. Therefore, the population doesn't count at all for these regs. There's a lot of money in the population of smokers for BT and BP that counts!