That's a no brainer. You purchase another freezer just for vape supplies.
That's a nice one. "standard household 110-Volt outlet or a 12-Volt power source, like an automotive battery" Doesn't appear to after a OEM lock, though - easily added on Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
That's a nice one. "standard household 110-Volt outlet or a 12-Volt power source, like an automotive battery" Doesn't appear to after a OEM lock, though - easily added on That's all Kool & The Gang, but I could show you dozens of "spam" messages in my box and/or my filter, from just today, for companies I've never done business with, and who appear to be in no fear of repercussions of any sort.
Thinking spam can be banned is like the FDA thinking they can regulate cotton balls...oh...wait...
Not only would SFATA sending emails (or providing blasts to their retailer network, pick your poison) be common practice, NOT doing it would make them the lone advocacy group in the world not doing it.
Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!
Link to Lessifer's Petition Not angry as much as Determinedpretty much what i said, except you seem to be a little more angry
Perhaps the only tiny ray of light so far? Some quotes though, from the article...Has this been discussed? I'm not caught up here...
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes
I'm also at work and can't research any of it...
""We are deeply troubled that these important safeguards were stripped in this way when FDA repeatedly demonstrated that the science shows flavored products appeal to youth and young adults," Harold Wimmer, president of the American Lung Association, said in a statement."
Yea, I guess the data did suggest young adults that vape largely use flavored eLiquids. When is the last time you saw UNflavored eLiquid at your local vape store? All the science shows is that when people walk into a vape shop they pick a juice that is sold there?????
"Proponents of e-cigarettes say the products can help people quit smoking and that flavors are a crucial element of what makes them attractive to adults seeking to quit. The FDA said in its original rule that evidence supporting such claims "is thus far largely anecdotal.""
If I read that "anecdotal" thing one more time I think I'll scream. In addition to a recent national poll claiming over 8 million US former smoking vapers, and numerous other international polls saying similar, the CDC itself acknowledged in 2014 that "nearly one in four recent former cigarette smokers (22.0%) currently used e-cigarettes, ". This is just so 1984, and the lies are in plain sight. All airbrushed out by the gov't lapdog "free press".
Products - Data Briefs - Number 217 - October 2015
Last edited:
This is not cotton balls.
Spam is generally sent from compromised machines. The ISP, upon detection, shuts down either the machine's outside internet access, or it turns off the offending machine's ability to send through the ISPs email server. Email traffic on the ISPs network is blocked unless it routes through their mail systems for this very reason. Spammers, at that point move on to another compromised machine, leaving the systems admin to deal with the mess. Their domain/IP will likely also be added to several lists, the SBL being one of them, to help other email servers in outright rejection of their future emails.
SFATA/CASAA being legitimate organizations, will a) lose all legitimacy if they send spam and b) be summarily blocked by their ISPs. The solution to this, as we agreed before, was for SFATA to craft the email and send it out to the vendors to then send to their customers, as there's a relationship there.
And how would that differ from Nicoderm / Nicorette, they are all derived from the same pure form liquid, if vaping is not an NRT nor cessation, it sure as hell is nowhere near the same composition as whole leaf tobacco products for the sole intent of burning.
Well, I kind of hoped it was something (somewhat) important, at least a small victory.
Hoping that at least someone might show some common sense in all this...
Not sure if anyone else bothered to click the link though.
I need to correct what I said. FDA approved drug and pharmaceutical products are exempted. Also, there may be one company selling a very expensive cigalike which contains synthetic nicotine.
It doesn't differ, other than the FDA was told they cannot regulate e-cigs as drug / cessation devices per the 2010 judicial ruling.
I'd like to see what Reuters based their article on, I guess I'll look at lunch.
Surely there's a press release somewhere.
Surely there's a press release somewhere.
V,
We are in agreement. I was stating with sarcasm how the reg is clearly written to eliminate open systems while still being able to "say" that they provided a path (PMTA) for approval. You are absolutely correct their is no passage which states this as anything more than a possibility which they will most certainly say "no" to. But yes I still hold out hope.
I read it. Heavily slanted "reporting" with save-the-cheeeldrun talking points from the usual BP funded ANTZ.Well, I kind of hoped it was something (somewhat) important, at least a small victory.
Hoping that at least someone might show some common sense in all this...
Not sure if anyone else bothered to click the link though.
Well, I kind of hoped it was something (somewhat) important, at least a small victory.
Hoping that at least someone might show some common sense in all this...
Not sure if anyone else bothered to click the link though.
I did, and also commented - my original comment was:
But they kept deleting it. You can guess who left the second comment calling them out on it, if that hasn't also been deleted.
The White House threw us a bone that is meaningless in the long run. The strategy: load the initial regs with a few selected throwaways. But leave in place the important stuff that kills the open system vape industry....Well, I kind of hoped it was something (somewhat) important, at least a small victory.
Hoping that at least someone might show some common sense in all this...
Not sure if anyone else bothered to click the link though.
"As submitted by the FDA to the White House Office of Management and Budget, the rule gave a grace period for flavored products of only 90 days after the rule became effective."
Yes, THAT.
I looked through the press releases at the website for the White House. I didn't see anything, but that doesn't mean it's not there, just hard for me to do at work.
I am sorry if this sounds rude but can we not celebrate one small victory
Similar threads
- Locked
