so age restriction at 21 but you can join the military at 17. [removed]
California offers an exemption for military personnel.
Last edited by a moderator:
so age restriction at 21 but you can join the military at 17. [removed]
Wait..ProVarinati Princess...(my power just went out...an omen..)
Ocelot is a lady....Uhmmm
Well, Madam President. What will be your first executive order...?
Ocelot is a lady....
Fresh goat's milk!
You're starting to remind me of a person I used to know years ago
went by the nick AriaWind.
Good Night, Katya. Sweet DreamsVery much so.
Night, folks. It's past everybody's bed time, methinks. Sweet dreams ya'll.
And thanks for cheering me up.
They're not content with protecting the "children," now legal adults, those 18-20, need to be protected as well.
Old enough to die in battle, but NOT old enough to vape (drink, etc.) simply never will compute for me.
Anyone seen this?
White House scrapped FDA plan to restrict flavored e-cigarettes | Fox News
IF, this is for real, could it be that the Gubmint is either incredibly finding a modicum of Common Sense?
or,
Simply starting to back-off realizing their pernicious Power & Money Grab Sham/Scam is failing?
Gotta keep up the pressure to get it ALL killed off and eternally impacted back into their Rectums from whence it came.
We owe a debt of enormous gratitude to the RCP for its well-timed, well-stated, well-publicized, and well-proven Declaration of Sense & Truth
Stay alert & vigil,
Stay vocal & active,
Stay committed & resolved.
Lives & Livelihoods are truly at stake.
Life, Liberty, and Pursuits of Happiness are not negotiable nor are they to be infringed.
Is it better to be liked than be respected?
Maybe ... Kardashians come to mind.
Sent via iPhone
One of the good guys:
Skip to about 7 minutes in. He is waiting for people and doesn't really get started until then.
Thank you, Robino.I'm old. It's Thursday. I needed to watch it again.
Trying to take cigs off the marker in 1964, when over half the adult population smoked, would have been politically impossible, i.e. political suicide for any politician who supported such a preposterous infringement on individuals' rights. Nope, decades of propaganda stigmatizing smoking and smokers would be necessary first. Heck, the politicians STILL don't have the nerve to do this now, 50 years later!I agree - and they could have taken cigs off the market back in 1964 when they believed there was a possibility they were unhealthy. They don't even believe vaping is unhealthy and have effectively deemed to ban them. The key thing here, again, is money. Lots from BT, none from vaping (as of now).
Last warning. This isn't the thread (or forum) for political discussions except in general terms in keeping on topic. Next one gets the thread shut down.