Parental discipline is tricky. There is a reason grandparents make better parents, it's because they learned from their own mistakes.
Children need to connect the discipline to the action, and the discipline also needs to be consistent so that a pathway is formed between the discipline and the action.
Otherwise, the discipline itself will make no sense to the child, and they connect other, often incorrect assumptions, concerning the reason for the discipline.
For example - If mom says no, but doesn't discipline to enforce the no until she's 'had enough', children see the discipline as an instrument of her anger, and not a direct consequence to their action.
When a no is given, and the no ignored, discipline needs to be swift, and consistent. Inconsistency, discipline too far removed from the action are the enemies of any parent.
While fathers have huge roles in parenting as well as mom's do, making the father the sole disciplinarian is also wrong, as that teaches only fear of the father coming home... and little fear of the bad action itself.
Dads are scarier in general, and while that can and should be used to good effect, good effect is still key -the main keys are always swift and immediate discipline in order to connect the discipline to the action, and that can only be done by the parent who is present at the time.
The funny thing, is that discipline need not be harsh... it simply needs to be swift and consistent. A willingness to actually get off the phone (for instance) long enough to pull a child away from a problem area while quietly saying no, goes so much farther than simply hollering a no, followed by an angry spanking when a parent has "time" because the child ignored the screaming parent to their hearts content.
People often miss the importance of those things.. and when your young you don't want to be "mean" so discipline is often inconsistent.
The less consistent the discipline, the more unruly the child, because they never figured out what caused the discipline to begin with, and ended up bitter and resentful of those in authority over them.
Children need to connect the discipline to the action, and the discipline also needs to be consistent so that a pathway is formed between the discipline and the action.
Otherwise, the discipline itself will make no sense to the child, and they connect other, often incorrect assumptions, concerning the reason for the discipline.
For example - If mom says no, but doesn't discipline to enforce the no until she's 'had enough', children see the discipline as an instrument of her anger, and not a direct consequence to their action.
When a no is given, and the no ignored, discipline needs to be swift, and consistent. Inconsistency, discipline too far removed from the action are the enemies of any parent.
While fathers have huge roles in parenting as well as mom's do, making the father the sole disciplinarian is also wrong, as that teaches only fear of the father coming home... and little fear of the bad action itself.
Dads are scarier in general, and while that can and should be used to good effect, good effect is still key -the main keys are always swift and immediate discipline in order to connect the discipline to the action, and that can only be done by the parent who is present at the time.
The funny thing, is that discipline need not be harsh... it simply needs to be swift and consistent. A willingness to actually get off the phone (for instance) long enough to pull a child away from a problem area while quietly saying no, goes so much farther than simply hollering a no, followed by an angry spanking when a parent has "time" because the child ignored the screaming parent to their hearts content.
People often miss the importance of those things.. and when your young you don't want to be "mean" so discipline is often inconsistent.
The less consistent the discipline, the more unruly the child, because they never figured out what caused the discipline to begin with, and ended up bitter and resentful of those in authority over them.