It's like this wall business. Nancy tells us it's immoral. Now, I don't think it is but I'm more than willing to be convinced otherwise. I will at least listen and consider her argument. But when she has voted for walls in the past and hasn't ever declared the existing walls are immoral (much less advocate for taking them down), then her credibility is shot to hell. It's isn't the immorality of a wall that concerns her. It's something else (like politics). And then those who don't want the wall join forces with her using the same argument. This is what Pop was talking about. Nothing is real anymore. People have ulterior motives so you can never have an argument/discussion about anything because there are two (or more) issues being debated and at least one of those issues is known to only one of the debaters. Again, you just scratch your head sometimes. Nothing makes sense.
And there you have hit on another core issue - the lack of truth. As we all know, it’s whatever is expedient, especially in politics. It’s not about ideas and convictions, it’s lying to advance whatever it is you want. In pretty much all cases, they just want to stay in power and grow in power. Money too, but that’s because money is power. Whether it’s a wall or the FDA and Surgeon General with their weird insanity, it’s extremely frustrating and discouraging.
Then I remember there is good in the world even with this mess.