Actually yes, as reported here...Indiana files suit | E-Cigarette Forum. That would be hopefully where we don't get to. Requires even more $/participation. My thinking is the challenges have to come earlier in the process (and of the process) as all attention is on extending statutory authority and not the constitutional premises (purpose, intent). We need direction from advocacy on timing and resources so we may respond. Petitions are great but we're gonna need some more formidable pressure. We've got smoke-free up the ying-yang with our tax $ subsidizing intra gov tobacco (now vaping) control entities giving campaign contributions…and its all part of gov's operation! They've made the jump and mostly without viable lawful authority. Most don't see its a circular dialog and we're (the public) really not part of it. We might not be able to tear at the fed wall but we can try locally. Rights and definitions often better articulated. At least to attempt to preserve the individual and commercial right in as many states as possible. Then to as great a degree go on our merry way and dis them. In other words, if we cut the cash flow we bring them back to the table earnestly. Then whatever reg may ensue stands a better chance of being constructive. Not a mandate. But we actually need more help from the advocate/activist actors getting us involved and focused on target. Or, we will be blindsided. vape biz needs to be on point protecting their clients' interests there. If you want somethin', you gotta ask for it. And as JT (Vapestars) said down here in FL it's not a lame you can vape in your vape shop consolation prize.
Good luck.
