And charging a battery.
No coffee and passthrough then. Okey dokey. Hard to drive while doing both of those anyway.
And charging a battery.
Here's the article as an FYI if you want:
CORONA: Couple sues over exploding e-cigarette battery | Corona, Norco, Eastvale News | PE.com - Press-Enterprise
Since I started vaping 15 months ago I have never once heard anyone say not to charge an ecig in a car, or not to use a car charger with an ecig, or not to use a charging cable advertised for use in car to charge an ecig in a car. If the warnings are there they are pretty obscure. I am well aware of warnings about battery charging in general - but never hear about car charging. I mean attended charging.
I do see your point - it is a plug and play world.
But where are the warnings on this to Little Ralphie? That's where your analogy/illustration doesn't quite work as I see it.
I'll buy the FDA taking away ecigs over .... like this when they show me that no one ever burnt up their car with a lit cigarette...
Directed at Press-Enterprise: "Jennifer and Xavier were going to help Passport 2 Freedom, a non-governmental organization, build a community center for children in the slums of Rio de Janeiro, according to the lawsuit"
And that's relevant why?
All this (the other story too) just provides a window of attack for the "forces" that are hoping to shut this down. BT and BP will use anything to retain their monopoly.
That's old Baditude and you are reptitive with it - I think you need to get out more.
I see you are back to your old argumentive ways, too. It was peaceful here for a while...
Speaking of battery and charger safety issues, along the same vein are sub ohm coils with rebuildables. These have caught on in popularity like a wildfire in the Southwest. Noobs see these You Tube videos of RBA/sub ohm coils producing nearly inconceivable amounts of vapor from their mods.Thanks for the link . My comment - picking up from your analogy. Where are the warnings about attended charging of ecigs in cars? I haven't seen any - so this "Little Ralphie" didn't get a warning to start with - to extend the analogy. And I would say most vapers haven't had that warning either.
Should there be a warning?
The message to vapers is that its fine. Is it? if not, why not? To put the question explicitly. Maybe that's what we should be examining.
I haven't though Myk - I've said a number of times we don't know the cause of the thermal runaway. I don't see the need to blame some-one for using a charger if the charger is advertised for use in the car though. And actually - I don't buy your blame towards me either. If that's where you're at - including using emotive words like "absolve" which suggests some-one must be guilty in the first place to need absolution - then this has strayed too far from common sense.
And tons more who sell them too.
The message to vapers is that its fine. Is it? if not, why not? To put the question explicitly. Maybe that's what we should be examining.
That's old Baditude and you are reptitive with it - I think you need to get out more.
Baditude said:I see you are back to your old argumentive ways, too. It was peaceful here for a while...
I only posted an image for some comic relief. You are the one who made an uncalled-for comment to me. I've read of no objections to my so-called behavior on the forum, although defending myself in this post may well be called unnecessary by a moderator and "stirring the pot" as you called it. I had been supportive of you since your return, but I now see there's been no change. That's all that I will say on the topic. Have a good evening.Nope - just having a debate. That comment from you was uncalled for - and I have seen lately on the forum others who object to some of your behaviour too. I've seen the recent threads closed that you were arguing in. Look to your own old ways.
You only came in here to stir the pot. Lets keep it civil here thanks.