To all my ecf brothers and sisters.....please read.

Status
Not open for further replies.

vapbear

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 24, 2011
601
282
Brooklyn, NY
I've gotten the same response from my doctor!

I doubt you are a doctor. I asked my doctor to research it and tell me what he thinks. Several months later he told me that based on his research, including talking to several pulminary doctors, he believes it is as safe as any NRT products on the market and completely endorses me vaping. In fact he is recommending it to his other patients who smoke.
 

JollyRogers

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 30, 2009
2,537
1,070
Virginia
Wait a sec. Starbucks has banned vaping in their stores??? In Virginia e-cigs do not fall under the no smoking laws as stated by our current AG (which could change I know)... However, when a company makes a blanket blind statement like this, they can kiss my you know what. Starbucks coffee sucks anyways. Burnt and nasty tasting.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
If I was a non smoker and some guy next to me pulls out his Reo Grand or Provari when I try to enjoy my dinner in a restaurant I am sure I would not like it either so I just use my Pv's the same way I used cigarettes.

Common sense and common courtesy go a long way in advancing the cause. People seem to forget this in their zeal to promote vaping and lose sight that being militant tends to hurt more than help. Educate, yes - Antagonize, NO!

No one is advocating sitting next to others in a resturant with close tables and vaping large amounts of vapor in someone's face. Common sense and courtesy are part of being respectful. Blinding only vaping with smokers is also not the answer.
 

six

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 17, 2011
3,706
4,504
under the blue sky
*****This was a response I put in a thread about Starbucks banning ecig use in their stores. I felt this was important enough to post for more to see. *****

To be totally and completely honest, I honestly feel that we are digging ourselves into a hole that we may not be able to climb out of. .

There is more than one way to look at it. It seems like these days, if you want to gain rights you didn't have before or protect rights you think you already have, doing whatever you want wherever you want, organizing protests, hiring lawyers, having parades, challenging property owners, and getting on the news are the ways to further your agenda. It looks like small groups with common causes accomplish a lot when they work against the grain. Environmentalists, minority groups, etc etc etc often end up getting what they want by acting just the opposite of how you suggest vapers should act.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
There is more than one way to look at it. It seems like these days, if you want to gain rights you didn't have before or protect rights you think you already have, doing whatever you want wherever you want, organizing protests, hiring lawyers, having parades, challenging property owners, and getting on the news are the ways to further your agenda. It looks like small groups with common causes accomplish a lot when they work against the grain. Environmentalists, minority groups, etc etc etc often end up getting what they want by acting just the opposite of how you suggest vapers should act.

Good points. You would hope that common sense would prevail without needing to actively advocate for your rights. That is not the reality today. It's naive at best to think by doing nothing vaping will be accepted across the country.
 
Last edited:

vapbear

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 24, 2011
601
282
Brooklyn, NY
That's amazing and it would be great if every hospital starting doing this! Chances are many patients would chose to continue vaping and quit smoking when they were discharged. Just imagine all the lives this could potentially save.

My sister is a nurse in a major hospital. They PROVIDE ecigs to smokers who are staying there. That speaks volumes to me. Starbucks has nasty coffee anyway, imo. Already boycotting them for bad taste, lol.
 

mohawkx

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Mar 14, 2011
1,260
499
arizona
I took up vaping strictly for one reason. To give up smoking cigarettes and PVs have done the job very well. That being said, I don't vape anywhere I wouldn't smoke a cigarette. I wouldn't smoke in a resturant and I wouldn't vape there either. I've never had to ask anyone if it was OK to vape as I wouldn't attempt it if it was even mildly questionable. As I was forced to develop a modicum of self control as various laws banning smoking have been passed over the years, I just carry that over to my vaping habits. I have no urge to be evangelical about the issue. As far as I am concerned it is still a smoking habit and I've chosen years ago not to expose any one else to my smoking habit. Sticking something in my mouth and exhaling a cloud of smoke or vapor is distasteful to many individuals. To those people, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and produces clouds of vapor, then it's a duck and no amount of evidence to the contrary will convince them otherwise. Especially in a commercial business establishment where their revenue depends on customer participation and satisfaction. I respect those who wish to further the cause of general acceptance by the public and businesses concerning e-cigs but that particular route is just not my calling. If e-cigs ever become widely acceptable in resturants, I still wouldn't fire one up while a patron. I wouldn't care if someone next to me did and I would also understand if the person next to him complained.
 

vocr

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jul 1, 2011
584
145
Manila, RP
I look at these issues this way. I vote for corporations with my wallet. Its the only control we have over the rampant multinational corporatism that has taken over everywhere and its only effective if we work together on it.

Whether Starbucks lets me vape or not, I don't really care one way or another. However, if the vaping community decides to boycott it, then I am on board.

On a personal note, on this issue, I have over 150k miles on Cathay Pacific over the past 2 years so, if my airline lets me vape or not, I do care - a lot. I will not ever use an airline that outright bans vaping and, yes, I will use (and vote with my money for) one that allows vaping. I have to admit, I started asking around among my friends about ecigs after watching plumes of smoke emanate from the cubical next to me on a flight. Cathay is good on this issue, but if that changes they will loose all my business to whichever airline does allow it. If I run into any "deal breakers" like that which ban vaping I would let them know that they lost my business because of it. Even better if its a business that is significant. :)

This is assuming that no one ever discovers that 2nd hand vaping can cause harm to others. If there is solid evidence of that, well then I would be fine with being restricted like cigarettes.
 

wv2win

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Feb 10, 2009
11,879
9,045
GA by way of WV
I took up vaping strictly for one reason. To give up smoking cigarettes and PVs have done the job very well. That being said, I don't vape anywhere I wouldn't smoke a cigarette. I wouldn't smoke in a resturant and I wouldn't vape there either. I've never had to ask anyone if it was OK to vape as I wouldn't attempt it if it was even mildly questionable. As I was forced to develop a modicum of self control as various laws banning smoking have been passed over the years, I just carry that over to my vaping habits. I have no urge to be evangelical about the issue. As far as I am concerned it is still a smoking habit and I've chosen years ago not to expose any one else to my smoking habit. Sticking something in my mouth and exhaling a cloud of smoke or vapor is distasteful to many individuals. To those people, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and produces clouds of vapor, then it's a duck and no amount of evidence to the contrary will convince them otherwise. Especially in a commercial business establishment where their revenue depends on customer participation and satisfaction. I respect those who wish to further the cause of general acceptance by the public and businesses concerning e-cigs but that particular route is just not my calling. If e-cigs ever become widely acceptable in resturants, I still wouldn't fire one up while a patron. I wouldn't care if someone next to me did and I would also understand if the person next to him complained.

No one is stating that we all should go to resturants, etc and just blindly vape. Common sense and respect need to be part of the equation.

But back in late '09 and 2010, if we all would have followed your example, vaping would have been banned everywhere across the country and since it apprears you only started vaping this year, you would more than likely still be smoking right now. You would be fine with a nationwide ban?
 

36tinybells

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Apr 30, 2011
10,422
24,873
Right Over Here
That's amazing and it would be great if every hospital starting doing this! Chances are many patients would chose to continue vaping and quit smoking when they were discharged. Just imagine all the lives this could potentially save.

Well, the ones they have are the extremely low end type, so people aren't liking them much. However, now her and some of the other RNs tell them that they are low end and there are way better ecigs & ECF. She's so pleased I quit smoking after 30+ years, she likes to tell them my story. Hopefully that will stick in their minds and we'll see them here!
 

oldsoldier

Retired ECF Forum Manager
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 17, 2010
12,503
8,000
Lurking in the shadows
www.reboot-n.com
No one is advocating sitting next to others in a resturant with close tables and vaping large amounts of vapor in someone's face. Common sense and courtesy are part of being respectful. Blinding only vaping with smokers is also not the answer.
Not in this thread. but read this forum and you see plenty of folks taking a confrontational stance. Blindly antagonizing people isn't a good solution either. A calm measured response is likely to produce better results in the long run.

As you know already smoking is not a protected right, nor is vaping. So in the end being antagonistic is likely to close more doors than it opens because of property owner and business owner rights. The customer may always be right but the business owner is the one in the right by law.

And if someone had not been bold enough (I would bet) to advocate vaping to your doctor, he probably would not have known to research it and then mention it to you.
Indeed. And I'm willing to bet it wasn't someone that got in his face about it. Medical professionals generally don't respond well to that :)

I'm not a person that vapes in the smoking section- I vape in the non smoking section of restaurants that allow it. If it bothers people I stop (common courtesy rule, plus it is not like I'm going to die, I can always vape on my way to the car). In the rare case that they disallow it I leave my business card and try to schedule a meeting with the owner (not the manager). Of course sometimes you have to settle for a manager but it always helps to go straight to the top.

I vape at the Casino in the non smoking section and I vape pretty much wherever I go. But I do not vape where the proprietor or local law has prohibited it.

But that is the great thing about the forum, we can agree to disagree.
 

oldsoldier

Retired ECF Forum Manager
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 17, 2010
12,503
8,000
Lurking in the shadows
www.reboot-n.com
But back in late '09 and 2010, if we all would have followed your example, vaping would have been banned everywhere across the country and since it apprears you only started vaping this year, you would more than likely still be smoking right now. You would be fine with a nationwide ban?

I may have misinterpreted your stance based on earlier posts in this thread. I agree wholeheartedly with your statement that I bolded in the quote. Perhaps we are just using different words to describe the same idea :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread