I doubt you are a doctor. I asked my doctor to research it and tell me what he thinks. Several months later he told me that based on his research, including talking to several pulminary doctors, he believes it is as safe as any NRT products on the market and completely endorses me vaping. In fact he is recommending it to his other patients who smoke.
If I was a non smoker and some guy next to me pulls out his Reo Grand or Provari when I try to enjoy my dinner in a restaurant I am sure I would not like it either so I just use my Pv's the same way I used cigarettes.
Common sense and common courtesy go a long way in advancing the cause. People seem to forget this in their zeal to promote vaping and lose sight that being militant tends to hurt more than help. Educate, yes - Antagonize, NO!
My wife's pulmonologist endorses vaping for his patients. In fact a trip to him is what got us vaping.
*****This was a response I put in a thread about Starbucks banning ecig use in their stores. I felt this was important enough to post for more to see. *****
To be totally and completely honest, I honestly feel that we are digging ourselves into a hole that we may not be able to climb out of. .
There is more than one way to look at it. It seems like these days, if you want to gain rights you didn't have before or protect rights you think you already have, doing whatever you want wherever you want, organizing protests, hiring lawyers, having parades, challenging property owners, and getting on the news are the ways to further your agenda. It looks like small groups with common causes accomplish a lot when they work against the grain. Environmentalists, minority groups, etc etc etc often end up getting what they want by acting just the opposite of how you suggest vapers should act.
My sister is a nurse in a major hospital. They PROVIDE ecigs to smokers who are staying there. That speaks volumes to me. Starbucks has nasty coffee anyway, imo. Already boycotting them for bad taste, lol.
It's naive at best to think by doing nothing vaping will be accepted across the country.
I took up vaping strictly for one reason. To give up smoking cigarettes and PVs have done the job very well. That being said, I don't vape anywhere I wouldn't smoke a cigarette. I wouldn't smoke in a resturant and I wouldn't vape there either. I've never had to ask anyone if it was OK to vape as I wouldn't attempt it if it was even mildly questionable. As I was forced to develop a modicum of self control as various laws banning smoking have been passed over the years, I just carry that over to my vaping habits. I have no urge to be evangelical about the issue. As far as I am concerned it is still a smoking habit and I've chosen years ago not to expose any one else to my smoking habit. Sticking something in my mouth and exhaling a cloud of smoke or vapor is distasteful to many individuals. To those people, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and produces clouds of vapor, then it's a duck and no amount of evidence to the contrary will convince them otherwise. Especially in a commercial business establishment where their revenue depends on customer participation and satisfaction. I respect those who wish to further the cause of general acceptance by the public and businesses concerning e-cigs but that particular route is just not my calling. If e-cigs ever become widely acceptable in resturants, I still wouldn't fire one up while a patron. I wouldn't care if someone next to me did and I would also understand if the person next to him complained.
That's amazing and it would be great if every hospital starting doing this! Chances are many patients would chose to continue vaping and quit smoking when they were discharged. Just imagine all the lives this could potentially save.
Not in this thread. but read this forum and you see plenty of folks taking a confrontational stance. Blindly antagonizing people isn't a good solution either. A calm measured response is likely to produce better results in the long run.No one is advocating sitting next to others in a resturant with close tables and vaping large amounts of vapor in someone's face. Common sense and courtesy are part of being respectful. Blinding only vaping with smokers is also not the answer.
Indeed. And I'm willing to bet it wasn't someone that got in his face about it. Medical professionals generally don't respond well to thatAnd if someone had not been bold enough (I would bet) to advocate vaping to your doctor, he probably would not have known to research it and then mention it to you.
But back in late '09 and 2010, if we all would have followed your example, vaping would have been banned everywhere across the country and since it apprears you only started vaping this year, you would more than likely still be smoking right now. You would be fine with a nationwide ban?