It was my understanding it was only the packaging that changed not the shape/size/fit of the coil.
Honestly, I don't think the problem is so much about the "Packaging" - nor the "Coils" themselves . . . As
@JCinFLA mentioned - some people, not everyone - found that the "Newer" Z Coils to be problematic - ex: NOT lasting as long & "Duds" (BTW: I personally can attest to a couple of "Duds") . . . The other problem is/are the Vendors who misrepresent the product they are selling using the older images and descriptions for Zenith/Zlide coils, but sending the Z- coils instead . . . As "JCinFLA" also mentioned in her post - she called the vendor prior to ordering, especially to make sure these were the original Zenith Coils and was informed they were - that is why she ordered them and pass the "Word" on to the rest of "Us" . . . NOT NICE ! ! !
Worse - To "ME" - Some of these vendors are charging different prices for Zenith - Zlide coils - yet sending Z - Coils in their place . . . As an example
(which I also posted previously in a couple of threads, including Innokins New Packaging ? ? ? Zenith Coils are now Z Coils ? ? ? and this thread): A few months ago I purchased both Zenith Coils & Zlide Coils and that were labeled as such on the vendors website; They were also listed at different prices $14. / $9 respectively too. However, I was sent Z-Coils. When I contacted them about this - I was informed of the change in packing and that they were still the same coil that can be used in a number of different Innokin tanks now. As a result - I question the difference in prices and being overcharged - I asked to be refunded the difference in price (over $30) since I received the same coils. Their response was that would give me "points' / credit - no cash refund . . . Talk about - Not Nice ! ! !
I don't know about you or anyone else, however I find the "Bate & Switch" practices of some Vendors is without a doubt unacceptable. As a result they will not get business no matter how inexpensive their prices might be . . . Just Sayin' . . .
.
.