wow really? so does this mean when current stock of prebottled eliquid runs out after 8/8/16 that shops will no longer be able to make and sell their eliquid? That is not how I understood it, I thought as long as it was the exact same eliquid recipes they had been making before that date they could continue to make it...
I saw where it was determined that any new mixing is new manufacturing. So, only what's been "manufactured" before the August deadline will be allowed, including mixing.
That's not what I'm saying. Stuff already on the shelves or supplied from elswhere that was mixed before the August date is OK.
And the only part I'm certain of, is that mixing is manufacturing. I hate all this pretending that one thing is really another, just by FDA's saying so.
Directly from the FDA website:
"If you operate a vape shop that mixes or prepares liquid nicotine or nicotine-containing e-liquids, or creates or modifies any type of ENDS, you are considered a manufacturer and must comply with all of the legal requirements for tobacco product manufacturers."
I seen the post by Bill in the other thread and and was dumb founded. I tagged him
and asked for clarification. Bill implied in his post (which i have seen repeated on comments
on a least one other site) that the FDA was planning to do this.
My concerns and conclusions are the same as many of you have posted.
If a B&M is mixing juice they simply are just another manufacturer like any
other manufacturer as defined in the reg.'s. Mt. Baker fills orders as they
are received. I am pretty sure they are mixed as ordered upon confirmed order.
Bottled,packaged and out the door. I believe there system is highly automated
and needs not to depend on pre-bottled stock in every conceivable blend of
the products they sell. My conclusion is if the FDA thinks they can just
walk into B&M's and shut down there mixing or re-bottling operations,
They have to stop Mt. Baker also as the B&M's and Mt.Baker for all
intents and purposes are in the same legal classification. They are both
manufacturers of tobacco products.
If Bills sources are right I for one hope the FDA tries to close down the
B&M's. I am not a lawyer and have never had any formal legal education
but, even I can say with confidence this would be at minimum a violation
of the equal protection under the law clause. If challenged in court it could
jeopardize the whole deeming process. Can you imagine the reaction of
all the clueless customers ? While imagining the reaction of all the cloud
bro's I am conflicted to whether or not I should laugh or cry.

Regards
Mike