No. They would just extend their overreach reach to criminalization for diy.
Good luck with that - they've been really successful with the "War on Drugs"
No. They would just extend their overreach reach to criminalization for diy.
I won't...
I am so sick of thelies that are being fed to the public about e-cigarettes.
That was mean.Well, John Oliver is aware of vaping. He made a brief joke about it on his April 3, 2016 show.
8:10 +/-
John Oliver Tackles Absurdity of Congressional Fundraising
If you think that's impressive, wait 'til you see the marriage contract he draws up.I like the way you talk. Marry me!
We're just a bunch of pathetic addicts, Classy. You and me and choochoogranny...![]()
Doesn't seem like anyone's been willing to shell out the $11.00 they want to see how they mishandled the topic.Oh you mean the cover with the fake vapor in the shape of that which shall not be named on ecf?
I posted a comment about that ages ago, don't recall getting much response.
This:What did I say?
Anyone who thinks BT/BP didn't write those regs are naive.
If you've got more, please don't stop.
Some of the stuff just boggles my mind, particularly the part I left above. I'm seriously tempted to start the "OMG Juice Company". I'm thinking August 15th would be a good day to open for business. It should be a brand-new company that's never been in the business of supplying any tobacco or nicotine product. The plan would be to market a few nic-free juices; just PG, VG, and flavors are NOT made from tobacco. It doesn't matter if a whole lot of people buy it, the point is not to make money, but rather to get shut down by the FDA in order to achieve standing in the courts and get a declaratory judgement that the products offered are NOT tobacco products, and that the FDA can't force one to put statements on product labels that are patently false.
I have some flavor concentrates that haven't suited my tastes for vaping, but are great added to cereal.If you need a legal intended use, just say it's a flavored water enhancer.
Also, not directed at you, I take a day or two off and I have hours of reading before I catch up...
But might be good for laughs at a party or cause people to stare at you even more than exhaling vapor.
Ya know...I work in an office that is 2 family businesses side by side.
I have 1 co-worker and boss in our part and 3 that work in the other office.
I vape at work. They gave me e-liquid for my birthday.
They get vaping...I never had to say anything at all.
The reason I mention this is that it gives me hope that there are more out there like them.
That's what I thought.![]()
Nm! I'm too big a mess to abide by a contract!If you think that's impressive, wait 'til you see the marriage contract he draws up.
I refuse to financially contribute to the support of that rag based on their obscene cover photo.Doesn't seem like anyone's been willing to shell out the $11.00 they want to see how they mishandled the topic.
Hey everyone, what do you guys make of this ? Not sure if this was posted, if it was I apologize.
Hey everyone, what do you guys make of this ? Not sure if this was posted, if it was I apologize.
There's one very big difference.IMO I don't see much point in fighting the regs on the grounds of how onerous they are. They are essentially identical to the cigarette regs, and the tobacco industry survived.
Hey everyone, what do you guys make of this ? Not sure if this was posted, if it was I apologize.
I don't know about the VTA, they are in industry group, and I don't expect their wishlist to coincide with mine, but from some of their members I don't think closed systems are what they're hoping for either. Could be wrong though. He is right that moving the predicate date is not a cure. It is a necessary step though to keep the industry alive long enough to fight, IMO.He is not the first to step up and openly question the language in the Cole-Bishop amendment and who the VTA is... his other videos are just as interesting and IMHO raise valid points, problem is we are not in any real position to do anything about it.