Well, that would overlook the power of an administration. If the next DHHS secretary wants those regulations rolled back, diluted, changed, neutered or whatever then it matters who the next president is.
Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
I will NOT talk PARTY Politics or attempt to preach to anyone's Choices. I have mine and they ARE my business, My Right and I must ultimately accept responsibility for them.
That said, I will share a Poll I have not seen posted. The read is somewhat enlightening and interesting.
Poll: Trump Is The Most Pro-Vape Candidate, But Still Loses to Clinton Among E-cigarette Users
That said, I will share a Poll I have not seen posted. The read is somewhat enlightening and interesting.
Poll: Trump Is The Most Pro-Vape Candidate, But Still Loses to Clinton Among E-cigarette Users
A few hours ago I pretty much said everything you said and I got accused of being hoodwinked by the Democrats and quoting Emerson.
I'm pretty sure that guy was drunk. But, he is your brother in this. Upright him an point him at the enemy.
I haven't either. So I am left to surmise. Here is what I surmise and anyone can agree or disagree. Makes no difference to me. If Hillary gets elected the FDA regs stay as written. She has never seen a regulation she didn't like that I know of. If Trump gets elected, I'm not certain but my guess is he'll go along with anything his DHHS secretary tells him (as it relates to vaping). He simply doesn't care enough to make a stand one way or another. But I'm guessing (again) that he'll appoint someone who will be pro vaping. Bottom line, I feel vapers stand a better chance of neutering these regs under Trump than I do Hillary. I still think odds are pretty good Ben Carson will be running the DHHS if Trump is elected. In lieu of knowing for certain, this is what I surmise.
I'm sure most everyone on this thread is familiar with this OUTSTANDING documentary...
Well, here is a brief version that you might have better luck getting others to watch...
Having said that, if you can get people to watch the full version, definitely do so.
I declared it to be mandatory viewing in my house.
Which essentially means I made my wife watch it.
Well, here is a brief version that you might have better luck getting others to watch...
Having said that, if you can get people to watch the full version, definitely do so.
I declared it to be mandatory viewing in my house.
Which essentially means I made my wife watch it.
Last edited:
I appreciate your optimism but my confidence will continue to only be in my freezer and mod stash.
There is no D & R anymore, it's "We the people" against a tyranical overreaching government. The Gov are the ones who who would like to keep us all in small groups fighting with each other, it keeps us side tracked while they come up with the stupidity that is the Deeming regs. We have to keep going at them from all sides.
T
Thank you for the update. The short version with interview is a great recap.
I'm sure most everyone on this thread is familiar with this OUTSTANDING documentary...
Well, here is a brief version that you might have better luck getting others to watch...
Having said that, if you can get people to watch the full version, definitely do so.
I declared it to be mandatory viewing in my house.
Which essentially means I made my wife watch it.
Thank you for the update. The short version with interview is a great recap.
That's because it's not in the bill as it was written. It's an amendment to the original language of the bill. It starts on page 7 (of 40!): http://appropriations.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hmtg-114-ap00-20160419-sd004.pdf
Talking about comparison House to Senate Bills. Senate(Version) has no Amendment attached.
A Breakdown of the Senate’s Annual Food and Farm Spending Bill | National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition
Interesting process of Congress.
Ok, I'm having a oops moment then. It beats the AAAAAAHHHHHH moments I'm having a lot of though.
The funniest one I've heard so far...
Random Person: I'm allergic to smoke, so you can't use that near me.
Me: It's not smoke.
Person: Well whatever it is I'm allergic to it.
Mind you this was outdoors, and I wasn't very close to this person to begin with. Also I am a Tootle Puffer, so no huge clouds from me!
I would have told this person that I'm allergic to her/his existence and that they needed to leave. I'm a little sick of everyone else having rights but not us. In fact, I'm also sick of all of the "politically correct" crap. If everyone has rights, then we do too. Period.
quite a few people responding in the article spent their 15 minutes of cyber fame,, showing just how ignorant they are...........geez,, i hope they didn't breed the last thing our country needs is them x ####
FDA says they dont oversee the cosmetic industry UNLESS they add colors......hey,, seems like 0 nic ejuice could be called a skin care product scented with strawberry
Color Additives and Cosmetics
Actually he does. In a very unlikely but plausible scenario. What if momentum were to build "just enough" for Johnson to somehow actually pull off a win in a couple swing states...and also pull votes away from both Clinton and Trump...and make it impossible for them to get 270 electorals?
Then the nomination is decided by the House. Who do they vote for? GOP controlled house would commit political suicide by giving it to Clinton...and it's a way out for giving it to Trump. The Senate could nominate a GOP VP and the House could give the POTUS to Johnson.
It sounds insane but it's hypothetically possible. And this election has been pretty much insane since the beginning. I ruled Trump out the second he announced.
I know politics arent supposed to be talked about ITT. But the regs issue is political unfortunately. My State is as blue as the ocean. Doesn't matter who I vote for. The Electoral votes are going to the Dems no matter what. I voted for Johnson in 2012 and I will again. If we really are unhappy with the current 2 party lesser of 2 evils choices then only way for a 3rd party to become a legitimate threat is to make them a threat in the polls. This won't happen in one cycle or even 3. If it doesn't start somewhere we can complain all we want about the status quo but since we aren't trying to change it then complaining about it is pretty weak and useless.
Similar threads
- Locked
