Email her back and ask what led her to this conclusion. Then cite all the positive studies that you know have been done. If nothing else, it should shut her up. Hopefully.
lol
Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
lol
Print Several copies of this out. Hand out these Copies at your next meet up that She is in Attendance.
Make certain She is not First or last, but receives a copy, with others in view.
image link:
http://www.vaporized.co.uk/wp-conte...rettes-according-to-public-health-england.png
I understand your reasoning. Personally, I don't want a third party. Just means one more party of corruption. I want no parties.
She is the type of person that if it wasn't e-cigs, she would find something else she didn't like about me. I'm sure you've all encountered similar! I just failed to acknowledge any of it, kept doing my thing, and she hasn't said a word again. Her purpose was to upset me, I decided not to play the game.
What I usually do is explain if people ask and are curious. Otherwise, I just keep my mouth shut. I know I don't want to hear about people's veganism, crossfit, gluten intolerance, etc. and I figure they don't want to hear about my vaping.
Wonder if ebay will clean sweep on 8/8?
I mean, despite a "policy" of no tobacco and in theory no vaping, there's at least 60,000 listings for RDA's, tanks and mods. It might be almost funny if they took a $500 fine on each item.
FDA sends a "warning letter" first though.
Dear Ebay, you will be subject to $30,000,000 in fines if you don't figure out the difference between a dripper and a dripper.
I mean, despite a "policy" of no tobacco and in theory no vaping, there's at least 60,000 listings for RDA's, tanks and mods. It might be almost funny if they took a $500 fine on each item.
FDA sends a "warning letter" first though.
Dear Ebay, you will be subject to $30,000,000 in fines if you don't figure out the difference between a dripper and a dripper.
It will be interesting to watch, but I don't think eBay has the resources to police every listing. There's lots of other rather dark gray stuff on eBay that has nothing to do with vaping. They take individual items down when notified, but it's like playing whack-a-mole.Wonder if ebay will clean sweep on 8/8?
I mean, despite a "policy" of no tobacco and in theory no vaping, there's at least 60,000 listings for RDA's, tanks and mods. It might be almost funny if they took a $500 fine on each item.
FDA sends a "warning letter" first though.
Dear Ebay, you will be subject to $30,000,000 in fines if you don't figure out the difference between a dripper and a dripper.
I bought a jug of roof cleaner off of ebay a month back. According to the FDA, since my roof is attached to my house which is used to vape in then my roof cleaner is a tobacco product and therefore not allowed to be sold on ebay.
I'm wondering why the FDA hasn't been asked why they continue to allow tobacco cigarettes to be sold in spite of the fact that they contribute to 43,000 deaths per year and 8,600,000 smoking related illnesses caused by smoking.
CDC - Fact Sheet - Fast Facts - Smoking & Tobacco Use
Vaping is rated at 95% safer than smoking, yet they are attacking the industry because, "We don't know what's in it". They know. Protecting tobacco settlement payments is key.
UK research finds vaping is 95 percent safer than smoking
We are caught in a fight to protect payments to state governments that aren't spending the money on required advertising to educate their citizens on the hazards of smoking.
Spending on Anti-Smoking Education Slips - Education Week
CDC - Fact Sheet - Fast Facts - Smoking & Tobacco Use
Vaping is rated at 95% safer than smoking, yet they are attacking the industry because, "We don't know what's in it". They know. Protecting tobacco settlement payments is key.
UK research finds vaping is 95 percent safer than smoking
We are caught in a fight to protect payments to state governments that aren't spending the money on required advertising to educate their citizens on the hazards of smoking.
Spending on Anti-Smoking Education Slips - Education Week
Last edited:
Well, sure - but that was settled already. The whole internet is OBVIOUSLY a tobacco product, as millions of people use it to learn how to get their gear working:
"any software or assembly of materials reasonably expected to alter or affect the tobacco product's performance"
"any software or assembly of materials reasonably expected to alter or affect the tobacco product's performance"
Thank-you crxess, am I the only one that cannot get the green areas to print??? Cheers.Print Several copies of this out. Hand out these Copies at your next meet up that She is in Attendance.
Make certain She is not First or last, but receives a copy, with others in view.
image link:
http://www.vaporized.co.uk/wp-conte...rettes-according-to-public-health-england.png
Not sure if your question is serious (sarcasm is hard to detect on the internet). Anyway Congress didn't empower the FDA to ban cigarettes or to require approval of anything on the market as of Feb. 2007.
Right. Congress knows darn well that banning cigarettes would go over about as well as Prohibition did.
The irony of the sanitation we're in is that they might actually be able to get away with it in another generation or so, if they let vaping thrive.
Will Definitely be an interesting Watch.
I personally have purchased Chemicals - NOT for Sale to Consumers and Banned for use in several States.
I am also of the belief many Laws are written to Protect IDIOTS from THEMSELVES.
BINGO!
Nothing New is absolutely protected if it can (under Zeller) Relate back to 2007 - Key word - NEW.
Nothing Old(pre- Feb. 15, 2007) Can be Banned or even ordered limited in sales volume, or further restricted by the FDC - i.e. is protected.
While the FDA can create a
Storm over New innovation, the Very most the FDA can do to Grandfathered Tobacco is:1) continued incremental Tax Increases(have to protect Fed./State Revenues)
2) Spend Millions on Anti-Tobacco use campaigns.
3) Waste Millions on Tobacco Research Backing Ad Campaigns covering already Established Scientific proof of the Dangers of Smoking.
I wonder just how astronomical the Total output of $$$ US Dollars $$$ is on informing an already informed public rather than Cracking down on Child Smoking/Possession Violations through the Wallets and livelihood of Complicit Adults.
With Health groups included I would venture to Guess - Billions?
We have a much more economical solution
My question was both serious and tongue in cheek on the reasons that tobacco cigarettes are given a free ride. You'd think that intelligent people in government would realize (and I think they do) that a dangerous product (cigarettes) has been left alone in favor of continuing payments to states while a relatively safe alternative is being beaten to the curb.
The big money tobacco corporations continue to enjoy privileges while the relative new comer (ecig) is being prevented from endangering the big tobacco money that's earmarked for the state settlements. It's a nasty game of political control. They realize the eventual demise of big tobacco as people switch to ecigs and have obviously been told to level (or tilt) the playing field.
I'd love to be a roving fly on the wall in the capitol building.
Similar threads
- Locked
