


I agree that I don't see anything about the government payoffs. This was an inevitable consequence of deeming vapor products as tobacco products.Maybe I Missed it? But where is the Connection to the Government(s) paying off CC Companies?
And Isn't this just an Example of MasterCard wanting to "Cash In" on the e-Cigarette Market?
Maybe I Missed it? But where is the Connection to the Government(s) paying off CC Companies?
And Isn't this just an Example of MasterCard wanting to "Cash In" on the e-Cigarette Market?
I agree that I don't see anything about the government payoffs. This was an inevitable consequence of deeming vapor products as tobacco products.
I just don't think you have to look for a conspiracy. It's not about getting something, it's about protecting themselves from risk. Try to buy cigarettes online in the US using a credit card. Deeming vapor products as tobacco products just tipped over the first domino, there are scores of consequences of that action coming.Any time major companies make moves like this, that so closely align with the government's regulations, it's usually safe to assume the company got (or WILL get) some kind of incentive to do so.
Sure, I'm a "conspiracy nut", but I just can't close my mind to the idea that there are only a few people at the top of the food chain, pulling all the strings, simply to benefit themselves.
I'm 100% sure MasterFraud has something to gain, from some backdoor secret agreement.
Companies as large as they are, have no soul. They go where the money is. And these new "rules" mean that many vendors may have yet another reason to close down...and as some have just said here, that means MasterFraud loses money...so that's clearly not their incentive. There isn't a federal agency that mandated these "rules"...this was an elective change in operations.
Someone at the top got paid off to make this happen, especially in the face of a new presidential/governmental administration coming on to the field. They wanted to make sure the FDA's legacy of cutting vaping off at the knees will last as long as possible, once Trump starts taking a machete to all the crap regulations that went into effect during the last two presidential terms.
I am not, however, above admitting that I could be 50-100% wrong. :humble:
Just how I see it.
Any time major companies make moves like this, that so closely align with the government's regulations, it's usually safe to assume the company got (or WILL get) some kind of incentive to do so.
Sure, I'm a "conspiracy nut", but I just can't close my mind to the idea that there are only a few people at the top of the food chain, pulling all the strings, simply to benefit themselves.
I'm 100% sure MasterFraud has something to gain, from some backdoor secret agreement.
...
Actually it is not mc that is doing that. It is the companies that actually do the transaction between vendors and mc. Got an email from LV that has an explanation. Let me see if I can find it......brb.I think the Incentive is that MasterCard sees a way to make a quick 500 Smackaroos off Retailers. Something that before Deeming they might have been Challenged more Aggressively as a Discriminatory Practice.
Not defending MasterCard or say'n that I agree with what they are Doing. I just don't see this as some Subversives Plot by the Government to Undermine the e-Cigarette Industry.
And I think the FDA (and some State Legislations) are doing a Fine Job of that on their Own.
Actually it is not mc that is doing that. It is the companies that actually do the transaction between vendors and mc. Got an email from LV that has an explanation. Let me see if I can find it......brb.
![]()
Can't MC sue them for libel or defamation?Yeah... I saw that Post about the Processors being the ones who were doing the Charges. And then Blaming it on MC.
Can't MC sue them for libel or defamation?