Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

JustWondering1

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 29, 2015
4,228
13,182
25% Off Site-WIde For A Limited Time! Goodbye MasterCard Sale.
View this email in your browser

25% OFF SITE-WIDE! shop now while you can, MasterCard will no longer be accepted as of 1/13/2016
If you haven't already heard, MasterCard has made some policy changes regarding the vape industry this last November which are going into effect on the 15th of this month. Most of the new requirements are reasonable, however one of the changes is very troubling, and has ultimately led us to drop them as an accepted payment method. To keep them, they would have us require Adult Signature on EVERY order paid for using their cards, regardless of whether the customer's age has been verified through a reputable paid age verification service. Why don't we just apply a rule set to MasterCard transactions and keep them? To put it simply, we can't. Our website and most others don't have control over the full checkout process enough to code such rules, therefore we would have to make a blanket requirement on all transactions though our website to require an adult signature, which would be a nightmare for both we and you.

Here is a link to an article about the issue, and here is a link to the petition to MasterCard you can join. Ultimately, the best petition is usually a boycott. After all, if you want something to go away, quit buying it. Personally, I will elect not to use my MasterCard credit card again until these policy changes are revoked.

In the mean time, enjoy the last 12 days that we will accept MasterCard at Lightning Vapes with this sale, and please spread the word! We will continue to accept VISA, American Express, Paypal, Amazon Payments, and very soon we will be accepting BitCoin!

25% OFF CODE: goodbyemc

The sale ends at 1/9/16 12:01 AM EST

Shop Sale Items

Native Wicks Cotton - Pima & Platinum
$7.99 - $6.00
View

Max VG - Strawberry Stratus
$6.99 - $5.25 30mL
$22.00 - $16.50 120mL
View
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,987
Sacramento, California
Maybe I Missed it? But where is the Connection to the Government(s) paying off CC Companies?

And Isn't this just an Example of MasterCard wanting to "Cash In" on the e-Cigarette Market?
I agree that I don't see anything about the government payoffs. This was an inevitable consequence of deeming vapor products as tobacco products.
 

HBcorpse

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jul 23, 2013
4,378
14,477
Maybe I Missed it? But where is the Connection to the Government(s) paying off CC Companies?

And Isn't this just an Example of MasterCard wanting to "Cash In" on the e-Cigarette Market?

I agree that I don't see anything about the government payoffs. This was an inevitable consequence of deeming vapor products as tobacco products.

Any time major companies make moves like this, that so closely align with the government's regulations, it's usually safe to assume the company got (or WILL get) some kind of incentive to do so.

Sure, I'm a "conspiracy nut", but I just can't close my mind to the idea that there are only a few people at the top of the food chain, pulling all the strings, simply to benefit themselves.

I'm 100% sure MasterFraud has something to gain, from some backdoor secret agreement.

Companies as large as they are, have no soul. They go where the money is. And these new "rules" mean that many vendors may have yet another reason to close down...and as some have just said here, that means MasterFraud loses money...so that's clearly not their incentive. There isn't a federal agency that mandated these "rules"...this was an elective change in operations.

Someone at the top got paid off to make this happen, especially in the face of a new presidential/governmental administration coming on to the field. They wanted to make sure the FDA's legacy of cutting vaping off at the knees will last as long as possible, once Trump starts taking a machete to all the crap regulations that went into effect during the last two presidential terms.

I am not, however, above admitting that I could be 50-100% wrong. :humble:

Just how I see it.
 

Lessifer

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 5, 2013
8,309
28,987
Sacramento, California
Any time major companies make moves like this, that so closely align with the government's regulations, it's usually safe to assume the company got (or WILL get) some kind of incentive to do so.

Sure, I'm a "conspiracy nut", but I just can't close my mind to the idea that there are only a few people at the top of the food chain, pulling all the strings, simply to benefit themselves.

I'm 100% sure MasterFraud has something to gain, from some backdoor secret agreement.

Companies as large as they are, have no soul. They go where the money is. And these new "rules" mean that many vendors may have yet another reason to close down...and as some have just said here, that means MasterFraud loses money...so that's clearly not their incentive. There isn't a federal agency that mandated these "rules"...this was an elective change in operations.

Someone at the top got paid off to make this happen, especially in the face of a new presidential/governmental administration coming on to the field. They wanted to make sure the FDA's legacy of cutting vaping off at the knees will last as long as possible, once Trump starts taking a machete to all the crap regulations that went into effect during the last two presidential terms.

I am not, however, above admitting that I could be 50-100% wrong. :humble:

Just how I see it.
I just don't think you have to look for a conspiracy. It's not about getting something, it's about protecting themselves from risk. Try to buy cigarettes online in the US using a credit card. Deeming vapor products as tobacco products just tipped over the first domino, there are scores of consequences of that action coming.
 

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,675
1
84,918
So-Cal
Any time major companies make moves like this, that so closely align with the government's regulations, it's usually safe to assume the company got (or WILL get) some kind of incentive to do so.

Sure, I'm a "conspiracy nut", but I just can't close my mind to the idea that there are only a few people at the top of the food chain, pulling all the strings, simply to benefit themselves.

I'm 100% sure MasterFraud has something to gain, from some backdoor secret agreement.

...

I think the Incentive is that MasterCard sees a way to make a quick 500 Smackaroos off Retailers. Something that before Deeming they might have been Challenged more Aggressively as a Discriminatory Practice.

Not defending MasterCard or say'n that I agree with what they are Doing. I just don't see this as some Subversives Plot by the Government to Undermine the e-Cigarette Industry.

And I think the FDA (and some State Legislations) are doing a Fine Job of that on their Own.
 
Last edited:

Sugar_and_Spice

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 11, 2010
13,663
35,225
between here and there
I think the Incentive is that MasterCard sees a way to make a quick 500 Smackaroos off Retailers. Something that before Deeming they might have been Challenged more Aggressively as a Discriminatory Practice.

Not defending MasterCard or say'n that I agree with what they are Doing. I just don't see this as some Subversives Plot by the Government to Undermine the e-Cigarette Industry.

And I think the FDA (and some State Legislations) are doing a Fine Job of that on their Own.
Actually it is not mc that is doing that. It is the companies that actually do the transaction between vendors and mc. Got an email from LV that has an explanation. Let me see if I can find it......brb.


eta Don't think I can post the email(ecf rules) but Lightening Vapes has sent an email correcting their previous stance of dropping MC. They now say it is the Merchant Service Providers adding on the extra rules and prices.
So they changed who they have process their transactions and are keeping MC.

:)
 
Last edited:

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,675
1
84,918
So-Cal
Actually it is not mc that is doing that. It is the companies that actually do the transaction between vendors and mc. Got an email from LV that has an explanation. Let me see if I can find it......brb.

:)

Yeah... I saw that Post about the Processors being the ones who were doing the Charges. And then Blaming it on MC.

Thought I might make a Change to my Earlier Post. But figured this thread is about Dead anyway.
 

somdcomputerguy

vaper dedicato
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Contest Winner!
    Yeah... I saw that Post about the Processors being the ones who were doing the Charges. And then Blaming it on MC.
    Can't MC sue them for libel or defamation?
     

    Users who are viewing this thread