Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

Pictor

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 27, 2009
9,066
19,246
UK
I've never burned my fingers or my clothes or my furniture with an ecig. That must mean that they are safer.
....and I stopped needing to crawl around under my desk before going to bed to make sure I hadn't dropped any hot ash! - big plus! :)
 

Steamix

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Sep 21, 2013
1,586
3,212
Vapistan
Nice ideas, not without risks though :

Riding too hard on the quit the stinkies horse, FDA will do an about face and say :

"See?! We been telling you all along that these are cessation devices and need to be regulated as pharmaceutical products."

Between a rock (BT) and a hard place (BP), seems they're divying up the vapers' hide already.

Too bad for them we ain't done in yet :)

You just fighting for profits, we're fighting for our lives - literally.
 

DPLongo22

"Vert De Ferk"
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Dec 17, 2011
32,960
182,710
Midworld
Then I can only hope that Mr. McConnell and Speaker Ryan are men of their word. In this election year, given the party's control over both chambers, it may be more expedient to adopt the spending bills than not.

I'll take it any way I can get it.

And that is NOT the first time I've uttered THOSE words in this life of mine. :blush:
 

bobwho77

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2014
753
2,404
Ypsilanti mi
I think these are fantastic. The sad part is the FDA would say, "you can't say that vaping made him healthier or saved his life because only a drug can do that." Heck read the back of a vitamin it has a FDA disclaimer on it that basically says this product cannot claim to make you healthier. Why? Because there is no money to be made on the backs of healthy citizens.

Sorry. I picked up my Evic VTC mini this morning and I just got mad: why am I being made to feel like a criminal for quitting smoking! PS: 2 months no stinkes after 15 years PAD.

A manufacturer couldn't make that claim about their specific product. I think a non-profit organization making them about vaping in general probably could. (Especially if the data/case studies back them up.)
I don't mention any brand names, and they don't have to even show a device, just the people.
The point is to change the way vaping is seen by Joe, and Jane Nonvaper. Like it or not WE have an image problem. The nonvaping public sees vapers as cloud chasing hipsters, and vape conventions featuring semi-nude women more than any of the products. (Forget reality for now. We're talking about perceptions) When they hear a story about a battery exploding on TV, their response is "Those things are dangerous. They need to get rid of them."
People see commercials for Blu, or Vuse, or Mark Ten, and they see out of context headlines "Teen ecig use Skyrocketing" and they think "Those greedy tobacco companies are at it again. We have to stop them before they hook another generation of kids."
WE know that that isn't the reality of the vaping community, but the general public doesn't.
The reason the FDA has been able to get the Deeming regulations through the way they are, is because they know that the majority of the people will say "Well, that sounds reasonable. It's about time they did something"
Until we start changing those perceptions, we're going to have approximately zero traction politically, and our only recourse will be through the courts.
I'll go back to my car analogy from upthread. We need to change the face of vaping from street racing punks, and Autorama style car shows, to the millions of people who drive Chevys, and Fords to work every day.
 

mattiem

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
We have all been so gung-ho about changing the grandfather date (not saying that is a bad thing) when, in my opinion, we should have been fighting tooth and nail to keep these life saving devices from being deemed tobacco products to begin with. The only way they can control this technology is by locking it in with the tobacco act of 2007.

I know there are those that know a lot more than I do are saying that fight would have been too hard so instead are putting all their energy into fighting to have the date changed. And now I am seeing division between those that should now be coming together. :facepalm: We seem to be our own worst enemy. :(

When I first posted this link sign the petition we were at 53,436 supporters. We are now at 55,217 so thankfully some are listening. I know all of y'all are and I want to say THANK YOU. If you are someone new to this thread and are just now seeing this, Please, take a moment to sign and SHARE the link.

And while you are at it you may want to watch this short video that lets you know exactly what we are up against.



Sorry Lessifer, I just can't help myself :D
 

wiredlove

Master Lurker
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2010
394
1,320
KY
None of those power tools or laptops have consumer replaceable individual cells though.

Flashlights are about it for consumer replaceable cells.
And those tend to use lower CDR / Higher MAH cells than is used in vaping.
Of course there are likely some rad flashlights out there which will burn the paint off your truck if shined on it.

Mostly it is all light related: flashlights, headlamps, spotlights, etc... but no, 18350s, 490s and the rest of the sizes were around well before they started making their way into mods. You should head over to the CandlePower forums and look around. It's where a lot of early vapers learned about li-ions, and you thought we're dedicated to our hobby? :laugh:

I have a couple. Thrunite Mini TN30 XPL CW and an Imalent DDT40. The Thrunite pulls about 5-6 amps maybe more on high, the Imalent, I'm not sure about the amp draw but I'll bet its probably more.

One operates in parallel the other in series. Both use 4x18650s or the Imalent can use 8XCR132A's. Neither can take the paint off of a vehicle, but I wouldn't advise looking directly into them on high. :D
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
Nice ideas, not without risks though :

Riding too hard on the quit the stinkies horse, FDA will do an about face and say :

"See?! We been telling you all along that these are cessation devices and need to be regulated as pharmaceutical products."

Between a rock (BT) and a hard place (BP), seems they're divying up the vapers' hide already.

Too bad for them we ain't done in yet :)

You just fighting for profits, we're fighting for our lives - literally.

Playing nice and by the 'rules' has gotten us absolutely nowhere.

The risk factor has been taken away from us. There is no more risk. The deeming has been Done. That's it. They are set to take affect in the timeline that has been set forth here in this thread. There is no more negotiation.

As far as calling these a cessation product, same rules have always been in place. Vendors Can Not state this.

WE CAN! :evil: Consumers can make all the claims they want, manufacturers cannot.
 

Robino1

Resting in Peace
ECF Veteran
Sep 7, 2012
27,447
110,404
Treasure Coast, Florida
Readily admitting that I'm not adept at social media, I'm trying to figure out where, publicly, to post comments on deeming. I thought I read that FDA had an interactive site, somewhere, but I can't find it. Anyone?


I have to warn you, it looks like a bot is answering questions by searching key words. Sometimes the answers that are coming from the "FDA" don't quite address the question asked. Also, I have not seen a reply from, said bot, to a question that is embedded in a reply to someone's comment.

Same 'bot' seems to be used on Twitter too.

So the FDA is giving the 'illusion' that it is concerned with our questions...... Yeah, and I have a waterfall in the desert for sale. Comes with snow on demand.
 

wiredlove

Master Lurker
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 2, 2010
394
1,320
KY


I have to warn you, it looks like a bot is answering questions by searching key words. Sometimes the answers that are coming from the "FDA" don't quite address the question asked. Also, I have not seen a reply from, said bot, to a question that is embedded in a reply to someone's comment.

Same 'bot' seems to be used on Twitter too.

So the FDA is giving the 'illusion' that it is concerned with our questions...... Yeah, and I have a waterfall in the desert for sale. Comes with snow on demand.

Or it's some poor intern with a list of copy / paste answers. Imagine that as a soul destroying job, for many reasons.

*even if it's a bot, I'm sure it is an unhappy bot.
 

lauragal

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 8, 2008
777
1,599
New York
edited for wrong info

Whether there are other uses or not, you can buy the exact Samsung batteries on amazon for half the price you would get them at the vape shop.
4 for $20, instead of 1 for $15 or 'special price' 2 for $20.

Same with LG and Sony batteries.

They don't put them up there just for us vapers.

They sell these on Amazon - 4 for $12.99
 

Attachments

  • 61fWruzz1SL._SL1000_.jpg
    61fWruzz1SL._SL1000_.jpg
    99.4 KB · Views: 24

skoony

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jul 31, 2013
5,692
9,953
70
saint paul,mn,usa
But there must be other uses. I mean, were 18350 and 18490 batteries invented just for vaping?
Paper was invented before cigarettes. The paper used to make a cigarette is regulated by the FDA.

I have heard the phrase wild,Wild,West used many times to describe the vaping industry.
The only thing that was ever Wild,Wild,West about it is all the Free Range Money running
across the fruited plains.
A manufacturer couldn't make that claim about their specific product. I think a non-profit organization making them about vaping in general probably could.
The FDA has already had discussions concerning references from non-industry sources
including non profit, and other sources,including forums. I do not know the results of
these discussions but, rest assured they are being looked at at best or will be squashed
if the FDA deems it necessary to do so at worst. This issue was discussed in the past
here. Many of us worried what would happen to ECR if this came about or if advertising
was eliminated.
Regards
Mike
 

mattiem

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
I'm still 99% convinced it is a bot.

Hell they can automate anything these days.
Kinda like the canned replies we get from our messages to, what are supposed to be, our representatives. :facepalm:
 

Endor

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 31, 2012
687
2,074
Southern California
Sorry Lessifer, I just can't help myself :D
Ok, first... this is not how I pictured Lessifer in real life.... I guess the Freudian avatar and all.... :)

Second, an outstanding job of summing up exactly what is going on. Really well done, Lessifer, congrats.

EDIT: I guess I don't look like John Hamm/Don Draper either....
 

lauragal

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Aug 8, 2008
777
1,599
New York
I feel bad for the vendors, manufacturers, etc. This is extremely unfair to them - they have businesses they need to support families, etc. We all know there is NO WAY the FDA will stop us, the consumer. I hope all of the vaping industry stands strong together and fights this tooth and nail. But they have to be united on all fronts.
 

bobwho77

Super Member
ECF Veteran
May 8, 2014
753
2,404
Ypsilanti mi
Playing nice and by the 'rules' has gotten us absolutely nowhere.

The risk factor has been taken away from us. There is no more risk. The deeming has been Done. That's it. They are set to take affect in the timeline that has been set forth here in this thread. There is no more negotiation.

As far as calling these a cessation product, same rules have always been in place. Vendors Can Not state this.

WE CAN! :evil: Consumers can make all the claims they want, manufacturers cannot.

I don't have the $, or the gear to make something like this work by myself, but I'd be happy to kick some ideas around with people who DID.
Let's see what we can come up with.

Patience(edit).jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread