I reflected that in my edit. They are complicit in it. Its about creating and controlling ONE large narrative and directing message. It applies to any and all that support the FDA.
Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
- th_trl_thread_readers 0
I reflected that in my edit. They are complicit in it. Its about creating and controlling ONE large narrative and directing message. It applies to any and all that support the FDA.
I saw the post that was in response to the other crap storm that was brewing. So, yes, I saw the post. Nothing has been deleted....
Just a warning to NOT Carry on in the vein that is struggling to go awry.
Don't read into it any more than is intended.
Just a warning to NOT Carry on in the vein that is struggling to go awry.
Don't read into it any more than is intended.
Check his campaign donor list for your answer.
I read something about because many reps smoke cigars, there are already things popping up to try to change the regs for cigars. If that does gain any traction, wouldn't that have a huge impact for vaping?
I didn't. I read her post (which was a continuation and an attempt to censor) and your reply. Then your reply to me. There's nothing to 'read into'. It's there for all to see.
One of those things 'popping up' is the Cole/Bishop amendment - which is why I said earlier - that may be more 'convincing' to many representatives than the grandfather date - which would be fine with me :- )
Your near perfect, imo. :- ) .... and have been for quite a while.
Aw golly gee willikers <kicks dirt> Shucks.
We've had some good conversations (about ecigs lol) before you became a mod.... and some since :- )
You'd have to know some earlier mods (now gone) to really appreciate what I said. Plus we had some good 'history' as well.
This may be included in "contact their reps" but making phone calls or even personal visits to your congressional representatives' offices will get more attention that e-mails which almost always seem to generate canned non-responses.
Don't hold me to it but I seem to remember reading, somewhere in that 499 pages of garbage, that user fees was the one bone the FDA threw to us. That, at least for the time being, there wouldn't be any user fees, just the initial application fee plus all the testing fees.I'll see if I can track it down.
Interesting. Since I finally have the correct name as in user fees I should have checked the Final first. HA! My brain! I just searched the 134 pages of the Final published in the Registry on 5/10/16. Better triple check me /lol but no waiver of user fees. Matter of fact:
Page 104 (EDIT: better to read the entire page 104 for any hope of context and then maybe take a long walk on the beach. /lol /humor)
(The inclusion of user fees in these
estimates will cause costs to be
overstated for manufactures and
importers who also manufacture
currently regulated products. In
addition, costs will vary by firm size as
user fees are based on market share).
Estimated costs per ENDS manufacturer
or importer are $827,000 to $1.21
million in the first year, $832,000 to
$1.21 million in the second year, and
$22,000 to $64,000 in subsequent years.
/ I need another nap!
Last edited:
Listen, I know the canned responses from our reps is laughable but look at them this way. They are confirmation they received your comment. And while the rep him/herself likely will not read it, his/her staff will at least know what it is about and report any trends they see in their mail.
Lol I don't blame you. I started looking and within 15 minutes my eyes were crossing. Then I got distracted by the serious lack of authorized AW IMR dealers in the states that aren't vape shops.
Similar threads
- Locked
