Deeming Regulations have been released!!!!

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,619
1
84,743
So-Cal
I expect the FDA will put the responsibility on the vape shop owners to prove what's being sold is permitted (has a PMTA accepted and was sold on or before 08/08/2016).

There is a Concept in Law called an "Implied Obligation".

The FDA is the Only Entity who can Verify that a PMTA has or has not been Submitted for a given "Tobacco Product". And what the Current Status of it is.

So if the FDA wants Compliance with the FSPTCA and the Deeming Rule Set while PMTA's are being evaluated, they have an Obligation to Inform Stakeholders just what Can and Cannot be Legally Sold.
 

MacTechVpr

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2013
5,725
14,411
Hollywood (Beach), FL
View attachment 906411

The TCA didnt need to make provisions on personal imports, they were already covered by the FD&C act.

https://www.fda.gov/media/114091/download
View attachment 906409

Well not explicitly. But they did call us all manufacturers elsewhere if we import anything tobacco whether finished product or no. So let me get it straight, FDA regulates the manufacture, distribution and sale of tobacco. So Congress separately writes in a broad discretion for the FDA to instruct enforcement action including on individuals by CBP (Regulatory Procedures Manual, Dec 2017, Chap 9 Import Operations and Actions, 9-2). Nevermind that this generally applies to goods that have been restricted from importation and CBP has specific notice and advice. Yet somehow they will know the battery in my package is in violation because it is, after all, tobacco.

How in tarnation is that supposed to work? And for the same reasons as approved or not PMTA products. Customs does not know. However, FDA can easily solve the problem by narrowing PMTA approvals quickly to their subjective definition of desirable Stage 4 devices and that will make matters rather simple enough for the idjutz.

There's really not much more to add regarding this unlawful appropriation of the vaping industry by agency. We've all been criminalized in effect and will be treated accordingly for thinking differently. The only question remaining is, to what degree.

Good luck. :)
 

Kent C

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 12, 2009
26,547
60,051
NW Ohio US
What law? There has to be a law one can be ignorant of. Show me the law. How can I be ignorant of a law that doesn't exist or has not been formulated clearly?

Meant as a bit of a joke, but....

Like in all departments of the US Gov't, there are regulations based on underlying laws. As almost everyone (here, at least) knows, the laws re: ecigs are Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (specifically sections 903(a)(1) and 903(a)(7)(A) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 387c).

And, like many laws, they are not formulated clearly so that unelected bureaucrats can interpret them to their own biases.
 

MacTechVpr

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 24, 2013
5,725
14,411
Hollywood (Beach), FL
Meant as a bit of a joke, but....

Like in all departments of the US Gov't, there are regulations based on underlying laws. As almost everyone (here, at least) knows, the laws re: ecigs are Tobacco Control Act of 2009 (specifically sections 903(a)(1) and 903(a)(7)(A) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 387c).

And, like many laws, they are not formulated clearly so that unelected bureaucrats can interpret them to their own biases.

And the SCOTUS can warrant them the laxity to do so.

Good luck. :)
 

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal

:censored:

"Zeller also noted that some deemed tobacco products may be eligible for “grandfathered status” because they were commercially marketed in the United States as of Feb. 15, 2007. These products aren’t “new tobacco products” and, therefore, do not need to submit premarket applications unless they were since modified, according to the FDA. Many cigar, hookah tobacco and pipe tobacco products fall into this category, he said." :-x

Well, that's just peachy! I'll have a cigar.
 

zelda

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Aug 21, 2009
7,433
11,278
Echo Beach
There is a Concept in Law called an "Implied Obligation".

The FDA is the Only Entity who can Verify that a PMTA has or has not been Submitted for a given "Tobacco Product". And what the Current Status of it is.

So if the FDA wants Compliance with the FSPTCA and the Deeming Rule Set while PMTA's are being evaluated, they have an Obligation to Inform Stakeholders just what Can and Cannot be Legally Sold.

I agree but I don't expect to see a list anytime soon.

in the meantime I do expect the FDA to will send out some warning letters to "show they mean business".:mad:
 
Last edited:

Katya

ECF Guru
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Feb 23, 2010
34,804
120,147
SoCal
Hey Katya...WHAT HAPPENED??? Yesterday (in the eGo ONE thread)...you were calm/cool/collected...when you said..."Let's see what the next chapter brings. I'm forever hopeful."

.

This post happened:
This came up earlier:

The FD&C Act does not exempt tobacco products imported for personal use from applicable requirements for tobacco product imports.

Importing and Exporting
 

UncLeJunkLe

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2010
10,626
2
28,683
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
A list is not part of "the law". They would have to change the law every time they add or remove a product from the list, so that would never work.

So since the list is not written into the law, ignorance of the list that doesn't even exist isn't ignorance of the law.
 
Last edited:

zoiDman

My -0^10 = Nothing at All*
Supporting Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 16, 2010
41,619
1
84,743
So-Cal
I agree but I don't expect to see a list anytime soon.

in the meantime I do expect the FDA to will send out some warning letters to "show they mean business".:mad:

It's just Hard to Say.

Because without a Publicized List, that seems like the FDA\CTP could be Opening Up a Pandora's Box for the Lawyers to jump out of. And the ensuing Maelstrom in the Media would make the CTP look like Rubes.

Zeller wants to Keep His Job if things change at the White House. So I think he will want to Avoid any Unnecessary Black Eyes if possible.

JMO...

But I think the CTP is going to Lay Low until the get a PMTA/Non-Market Order List together. Then they'll give things a week or so to make it looks like they have given Retailers ample warning. Then they'll start cranking up the Printers and start sending the Warning Letters.

But Hey, for a Agency that Fly's in the Face of Common Sense on Most Things. who knows?
 

stols001

Moved On
ECF Veteran
May 30, 2017
29,338
108,119
One thing I have learned is there is no predicting what the FDA will do at any given moment.

Recall Seldane, the only medication that helps my cat allergy I even tried shots for years and they did not work. I was bitter. Seldane was going to enable me to become a vet although I am NOT a vet and I must say, GLAD not to be vets have more debt than medical school etc.

But some folks dropped dead due to Q-T rhythms. They could have recommended an EKG or these days a genetic test (you have the susceptibility or you don't. But like nooooo..... Even though NOTHING else works.

Then you have Clozapine-- probably one of the drugs most likely to kill you (seriously) you have to get weekly blood tests for a long time and a host of other things and expect to like gain 678 lbs also not to mention "other stuff" but it is still on the market "For schizophrenia that has responded to no other things."

Only-- Off label prescribing. No doc gets in trouble for that unless it's a controlled substance.

They just..., It's going to be like 52 card pickup. WHO KNOWS NO ONE DOES NOT EVEN THE FDA YET THEY WERE JUST LIKE EVEN WITH COVID WE CAN'T PUSH THIS OUT AGAIN OH HOW I WANT TO I HATE ECIGS AS MUCH OR MORE THAN ANY OTHER POLITICIAN.

Lay low. Seriously, take it easy for a while.

Or, go nuts until this is some how "determined."

No one in the FDA knows ANYTHING about ecigs except the dude that quit, and they don't understand clinical studies anymore either.

Anna
 

Users who are viewing this thread