.
Everything else - what happens if you tootle puff or cloud chase with TC/ does the 'dry puff' apply at much higher wattages - no idea. I still struggle to see how Wang's study showed anything of value in relation to coil temperature (no coil involved) or vaping but I can see there needs to be more studies with TC/ higher wattage vaping.
But Dr F's 'dry puff phenom.' is not about wattage - it's based on the relationship between 'dry puffs' (vaper's unpleasant experience) and measured emissions. The other studies mentioned are about wattage and measured emissions. If you accept Dr F's 'dry puff', look at the studies of wattage and emissions of 3rd generation tanks, (with the correct testing parameters for the tanks etc.) I believe you can say that tootle puffers using moderate wattage (by todays's standards), 3rd generation tanks and not getting dry hits are very,very unlikely to be encountering any concerning levels of formeld. etc. There is clear evidence and studies to support this. If you get a dry hit (above scenario) you will encounter nasties - but as you won't continue to vape (as it's not pleasant and evidenced by Dr F's 'dry puff') it will be minimal exposure. If you smoke you will be exposed to it every puff of every cigarette you smoke. Harm reduction.Its not that I dont accept Dr F's tests, because I do. The thing is that all of his tests were based on wattage, and wattage alone does not answer the temperature questions. I think it is well within the realm of possibility, given all the combinations of mods and attys, that someone could vape at wattages that generate temperatures that Wang is saying could generate nasties, without tasting like devil's .....
Everything else - what happens if you tootle puff or cloud chase with TC/ does the 'dry puff' apply at much higher wattages - no idea. I still struggle to see how Wang's study showed anything of value in relation to coil temperature (no coil involved) or vaping but I can see there needs to be more studies with TC/ higher wattage vaping.