That's so disturbing, it's all backwardsPosted on the FP, also - but for those who prefer the views out back, The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA E-Cigarette Deeming Regulations are a Disaster for Public Health
That's so disturbing, it's all backwardsPosted on the FP, also - but for those who prefer the views out back, The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA E-Cigarette Deeming Regulations are a Disaster for Public Health
Posted on the FP, also - but for those who prefer the views out back, The Rest of the Story: Tobacco News Analysis and Commentary: FDA E-Cigarette Deeming Regulations are a Disaster for Public Health
Instead of weighing in, please just remind us again. Let's avoid a free for all.Just being polite and asking, kiddo, I'll abide, no problem .. but I do reserve the Right To Weigh In if others take off on it ..![]()
Instead of weighing in, please just remind us again. Let's avoid a free for all.
Military exempt because if they are mature enough at age 18 to give their lives for this Country, then they surely must be old enough to make in intelligent decision about vaping. Of course the Civvy 18 year olds are not mature enough to make the same decisions. But they are mature enough to vote. Maybe those immature 18 year olds will vote them out. Oh wait, the same guys banning vaping are the same ones pushing to legalize other thinies. Shut up, Kenna.Not illegal but "regulated as a tobacco product" by the F.D.A. So yes, it's about the MONEY and little if anything else.
I saw a bottom screen "ticker tape" this morning showing California has passed "restrictions" on "e-cigs" & vaping. Gov. Brown signed into law restricting vaping in public places, raised the age of purchase from 18 to 21 (military exempt, not sure why?) and Sen. Hernandez immediately chimed in with, "This legislation will save thousands of lives and reduce the burden on the health system." (Not sure what world he's living in!)
Good morning again everyone!
Von Vape
![]()
Agreed.My point was that raw IQ scores have nothing to do with success, i mean look at me, my heavily tested IQ is 139, and im a carpet salesman barely making it. I think it would be more usefull to have a class on the order of "economic and historical cycles and their effects" that must be passed before one can vote.
I also think the prez should have a historian as his top advisor.
Sent from a dark, twisted corner of the back porch, covered in cobwebs and slightly damp.
Smart man.I have always bowed to a Woman's Will ..![]()
What was that song in the 70's "Fourteen or fight", think it was an Alice Cooper song.I still say we need to raise the voting IQ to 110.
Whoa, no violence needed.[emoji38]I'm just used to signing off like that. Did the same thing back when I was into chat rooms. Truth be told, I wish I had a teleporter sometimes. It'd be so much easier to spend quality time with my GF that way![emoji23]Ummm, you wouldn't by any chance be holding out on us would you? You got a transporter pad? Does *gone* mean the same as Poof? I think I'd have to get out my own trying pan to bop you with if you do because Mike's been working on making one for a long time and still doesn't have it figured out.
Hehehe...doggies being doggies.That bed was nicely made up & very pretty before they fixed it.
Best idea ever. Less than 30% of registered voters actually cast votes for their congressmen. The majority of representatives win uncontested campaigns. Most only come out of the woodwork for Presidential campaigns and are clueless how government actually works. The President is a figurehead and a scapegoat. I'm still trying to figure out how Daniel Webster won the west side of Orlando when there isn't a republican living in that district. Our local news station went into that area to find out and asked people on the street. Every last one that admitted voting for him did so because they recognized the name and thought if he wrote the dictionary he ought to be pretty smart...LOL. Okay, enough outta me.They could just make voting mandatory with a fine for those who don't.
Stockpiling
Am I reading it right .. ??
The problem is - How much is enough... 10 year supply, 20, 30, 50... Could get expensive...
Near as I can tell, unfortunately yes, you are...![]()
The problem is - How much is enough... 10 year supply, 20, 30, 50... Could get expensive...