curl it in your fist and use it the same way they would a roll of quarters.
That's why they put the 16 second cut off on it.
curl it in your fist and use it the same way they would a roll of quarters.
Dang Stormfinch! You have it all planned out!!!
You do realize that Pope Francis is a Jesuit? Of course I realize it. why the did you think I put that comparison in there?
You know... I never liked that whole 'Electronic cigarette' designation... because some people actually vape 0 nicotine, so for them it's not a cigarette of any type. AND... you could theoretically also vape aromatherapy EOs, as well as dilute cold medicines (because the dilutant, propolyene glycol and vegetable glycerin are also used in asthma inhalers).
I like personal vaporizer, and I think we should all call them that. It's almost like we are buying into the anti hype. The power of a name...
I've often wondered if I could use my ProVari to vape my Albuterol.
You know... I never liked that whole 'Electronic cigarette' designation... because some people actually vape 0 nicotine, so for them it's not a cigarette of any type. AND... you could theoretically also vape aromatherapy EOs, as well as dilute cold medicines (because the dilutant, propolyene glycol and vegetable glycerin are also used in asthma inhalers).
I like personal vaporizer, and I think we should all call them that. It's almost like we are buying into the anti hype. The power of a name...
I agree. But the fact is, whether you can get cancer or not, being in a room with a smoker is hard on non-smokers. Just look at the walls in a room where people smoke... there's no faking how nasty that is. I smoked for decades, and when I'm NOT smoking, even I got annoyed with smokers. Whether 2nd hand smoke is dangerous or not, smoke is annoying, even to smokers, so how much worse for nonsmokers?
Vaping really doesn't bother anyone, unless you're vaping really smelly juice. There's no reason for people to pretend to cough and gasp like they're dying around it... but you will still see it.
Did you know that technically the study that started the whole second hand smoke drumbeat is a complete crock? The EPA cherry picked their info and used a lower confidence interval than what was and is the gold standard amongst epidemiologists to "prove" their theory. Scientific Evidence Shows Secondhand Smoke Is No Danger | Heartlander Magazine Granted, I can understand why non smokers would find being caught up in it irritating, I now notice it when I go to the club once in a blue moon, but they have a bigger chance of developing lung cancer from walking down a city street than being in a room with a smoker.
As for what their problem is, they're sheep and believe what they're told by the press, who print whatever disingenuousness the health organizations care to spew. So much for Edgar Allen Poe's warning: "Believe nothing of what you nothing of what you see, and half of what you hear".