Just got the elevate going myself and I agree with everything you just said. It's an awesome rta
Can't recommend the doggy enough. Try one of the 2k18 top fillers or the sjmy 2k16 bottom fill version. They are all with a bigger airflow hole.
It all simply depends on how you want to define "restrictive". The restrictiveness that I was referring to in my previous reply can hardly be felt if you're taking really slow drags, but then, the OP didn't specify anything about taking really slow drags, and, the Reload RTA does meet the OP's only other criterium of "air holes at least 2.3mm in diameter" so not sure what you must be getting at here. IMO it's still the best RTA of them all. For this reason alone, it's the only RTA that currently I own and use. The rest of what I use are all typical high end RDAs of various types and sizes, but I never put the airflow wide open on any atomizer I own (usually I have them at about 2/3 of the way open), excepting only on the Reload RTA so I stand by my conclusion that the amount of restrictiveness of the Reload RTA is way more than reasonable enough.
Same here. The flavor that the Reload RTA can produce is worth jumping up and down about, and so I'm jumping up and down about it.
Air pressure is something to be taken very seriously on any tank. If you close down the air intake even by 2/3 air pressure changes and everything suffers. Flavor and vapor. The reload is one of those tanks. If you like it, great, but, air pressure is completely different. Leave that to cloud chuckers, there are far better things for flavor than the Reload nowadays.
Same here. The flavor that the Reload RTA can produce is worth jumping up and down about, and so I'm jumping up and down about it.
Yes, but it is my understanding the OP did not mention anything about the number of air holes. My bad... I didn't know this thread was for people with only one lung. And, again, air intake and restrictiveness, although related of course, are two entirely different things, as there's low intake restrictiveness and there's high intake restrictiveness. Both types are restrictiveness. But in these kinds of discussions there's always someone who wants to just make all the simplest of the simple things as confusing as terribly possible.
Yes, but it is my understanding the OP did not mention anything about the number of air holes. My bad... I didn't know this thread was for people with only one lung.
And, again, air intake and restrictiveness, although related of course, are two entirely different things, as there's low intake restrictiveness and there's high intake restrictiveness. Both types are restrictiveness. But in these kinds of discussions there's always someone who wants to just make all the simplest of the simple things as confusing as terribly possible.
That's one thing that bugs me. I love the SMM for the thick, dense clouds. I'm somewhat flavor blind, I taste but not the subtle things. So flavor is nice but not top priority.
Speaking of generalities, I'm an atheist in the general sense (despite I do own two different versions of the Hammer Of God "Four Horsemen" and a Deathwish Modz t-shirt that has upside down crosses on it) so I don't believe the assertion that the airflow parameters for a restricted lung hit are set in stone by some kind of spiritual vape entity.Restricted Lung inhalation atomizers as a whole have a definition that is between the definition for MTL inhalation atomizers and DL inhalation atomizers.
that definition is defined in amount of airflow that is somewhere between the MTL and the DL.
there are definite parameters for this definition (which I gave in my previous post), and the OP stated clearly she was interested in the upper parameters of the definition and not the lower, but this doesn't mean she was asking for devices that were well beyond the defining parameters of RL.
It's only complicated by the fact people want specific features, and not generalities when vaping, most usually. If generalities worked for us I'd be happy with a clearo and so would you
as I said, I'm sure the reload is a very good tank. It's awesome to talk with you!
as for my one lung.. lol. My son thinks so too.. I think his are steel traps... hahaha to each his own.
Speaking of generalities, I'm an atheist in the general sense (despite I do own two different versions of the Hammer Of God "Four Horsemen" and a Deathwish Modz t-shirt that has upside down crosses on it) so I don't believe the assertion that the airflow parameters for a restricted lung hit are set in stone by some kind of spiritual vape entity.
Here's what the correct definition of "airy vs restricted" looks like, specifically in this post:
Hey, SvoeMesto, I'm not going to pay 200 bucks for a tank that needs (inadequate) modifications. People are stuffing ss mesh and all kinds of coils into that tube to reduce the diameter. 
Oh s#*t!
One day, we'll actually get definitive pressure ratings in the specs from mfgs, instead of having to have these discussions and do mental extrapolation from: below port intake/af hole dia/chimney/DT size, or trial and error. Then we can spend more time arguing about "best mod ever," "is Juul evil," "clone vs. authentic," and stuff like that.
One day, we'll actually get definitive pressure ratings in the specs from mfgs, instead of having to have these discussions and do mental extrapolation from: below port intake/af hole dia/chimney/DT size, or trial and error. Then we can spend more time arguing about "best mod ever," "is Juul evil," "clone vs. authentic," and stuff like that.
I mean, it's not like it's rocket surgery or brain science to measure pressure. You listening, Phil? Anyone who reviews?
