........Many people around the globe have informed me they don't have access to 190 proof, most can't even get 151. I do believe 151 would work just fine but haven't tried it myself. My curiosity is peaked so I'll use 151 proof PGA for my next extraction, we'll see what transpires....
I performed the experiment using 151 proof PGA for the extraction solvent. For the experiment I extracted C&D's "Old Joe Krantz". After the 12 hour hot extraction was complete I drew 30ml of extract off before sealing the jar and allowing the remainder to sit at room temperature for a month. The 30ml that was drawn off has been freeze filtered, reduced, and filtered. Initially I reported the extract smelled off, something like an over-processed hot PG based extraction, it still does. I mixed up 10ml of NET and shake-N-vape it tastes terrible. Generic musty tobacco flavor that doesn't resemble the Old Joe Krantz I'm familiar with. Tastes "murky" and lacks any well defined flavor notes, low or high. I'll let it age for a month before re-sampling but I have -serious- doubts about its chances.
I'm disappointed (and a bit surprised) but I'm also now curious. If the 25% water content in 151 proof PGA has this much negative impact on flavor, how much does the 5% that's present in the 190 proof I normally use have? Would flavor be noticeably better if 200 proof (pure ethanol) was used? I intend to find out but it'll be a few weeks before I can.