Okay, last try. Read this part carefully. It really is simple if you take your time. This is what I said:
"Everyone that stocks up is 100% safe, regardless of how much they stock, or if the government cared enough to track how much they own. Unless they become a seller of illegal products."
I can't read that last sentence. Can you make it bigger? And more red?
Anyway, I'm pretty sure last go around, I said I highly disagree with 100% safe. You'd probably been better off with the 95 percentile number. I also said the same would apply to all black market operators that are stocking up. In this moment, they are 95% safe, nothing (really) to worry about.
I think the term seller either needs to be eliminated from your point, or understood as only a part of what the crime would be. That being distribution. It would certainly be in interest of all black market operators to give out small free samples of their stuff. And entirely up to them how long they choose to distribute freely. All rules are literally off the table if breaking the, possibly yet to be written, state laws regarding distribution.
The Federal law (or Guideline) is out. All vaping products, that either don't have or haven't filed for a PMTA, are illegal. In this moment, the proper response to that Guideline is, BFD. So what? I'm very much going to vape in the same way I was vaping the day before I read that.
But for all of my vaping time (since 2010), this has been forefront consideration. I came to this site, many years ago, with vocal intent to counter narrative that everything is going to be banned. In some ways, I was definitely wrong about that. Though those discussions were about it would all be banned, for sure, by no later than 2016. Which if Hillary was POTUS, I'd say yes, for sure. 2017 at latest.
Given what Final Guidance clearly says, all the products are illegal. Obviously not all, all. But for sure like 99.999999%. Need that many numbers after the decimal if taking all flavors as individual products into consideration. They are in violation of the Tobacco Control Act. And clearly FDA means business now. Especially after getting their butts handed to them a decade or so ago. This is how ridiculously slow they move, but they are literally coming for it all. They'll fail. But I do think it'll get harsh very soon. Especially harsh, because anti-types will turn propaganda on high gear now. Full speed ahead.
I would say between now and at least August of 2020 that possession will remain a non issue. Which holds true for underground distributors. It very well could be a state legal issue, but enforcement I think will be rare. Depending how propaganda goes, possession could become a really big deal, in terms of need to bust people with lots of product stored. I very much hope it never gets to that point, but I think it will. The kids fight is where the war is at right now, at least from their side. They'll fail in that. Yet, they stand great chance of making huge strides. All of which will impact the adult market. So the adults that applaud busting distributors who get stuff to minors, congratulations on doing those adult vapers in. I find your lack of foresight astounding. Lest anyone doubt it, kids are going to be vaping for a long time.
So, with all that said, I find the assertions you asked that I read for my 8th time, to be laughable. Admittedly, the 100% claim is the most laughable, but the "unless they become a seller" is up there in terms of being funny. At least to me.
Moot point. To be charged with a crime, there has to be a law on the books making it illegal. There are laws against selling some vape products, but currently no law against owning any. And as I said, this hasn't even been proposed by anyone. Ever. You can postulate all you want about that happening at some point, but using that logic, there could one day be a life sentence imposed for having a forum username that contains an 8. But like the former, I wouldn't worry about the latter.
Fortunately, my position can say there is a law on the (federal) books that has made all the products illegal. I would certainly think a very logical step from the other side would be to control possession laws around liquid nicotine. Hopefully to the benefit of people that have gallons stored. But for it only to be based on sales, would be a bit dumb. I guess we can only hope they are that dumb. I feel it will be based on distribution, so that anyone giving anything, would be subject to it.
Sorry, everyone. I'm out, as far as this subject goes. Won't beat my head against that wall anymore. I just want to do my part to make it clear to anyone that might (be naive enough to) buy into this, that they don't need to worry about owning vape products.
I would say it depends on the vape product. Most of society would never care to understand 90% of the products we enjoy. The liquid nicotine one, I think they get. E-Liquid, they at least partially get. Those two, going forward, could become a bigger deal than they are right now, which is in the territory of non-issue.
To take Final Guidance so lightly is perhaps where we are at odds. I truly see ANTZ propaganda going up even more now, and in ways that are insane, illogical, cruel. Ya know, like the vape THC scandal, that to this moment is still somewhat attributed to the demand to vape nicotine.
I don't know how many times I could say stocking up is not a problem, in my book. I honor all who make that decision. And very glad some of you (or us) will choose to be distributors. But in their book, going forward, I do think we are quickly moving to a point where eLiquid and liquid nic, will have rules regarding possession and distribution. And ANTZ rhetoric will try to make it known that all who possess, are essentially evil. I hope the society we live in is smarter than that.