I think it is pretty clear the buyer of the $30 'clone' wants the look of the $180 authentic...
Man, is this thread weird... Since the case of Super-T was brought up earlier, what the hell is original or proprietary about anything they produced, except for their pricetag?
I think it is pretty clear the buyer of the $30 'clone' wants the look of the $180 authentic...
Many people buy whatever they want regardless of markings. If a clone is made with or without markings,and functions as it should for 30 dollars, I would make that purchase. It does not matter to many people what the markings are. Many people do not even care about brands, as long as it functions.
I find that hard to believe. The commerce of vaping isn't different than that of any other industry, where designer labels are sought after, whether or not they are all quality items...
Overall, I do believe there is a small psychological component involved with buying clones. However, I would say for the majority of vapers that are quitting smoking it is a matter of utility. That being knowing the gear will work.
As for cloud chasers that are into the scene, I think the branding is a much bigger factor. An example would be when talking about gear. The people that "accidentally" forget to mention their equipment are clones probably have a much higher psychological component of brand recognition. However, I still think that this a smaller but growing segment in the vaping scene. Honestly, these types of people bother me, as they are not being intellectually congruent. Vaping as a lifestyle product as opposed to a functional product requires the recognition of brands as a part of that lifestyle. Thus if they are using clones they should readily acknowledge this fact in conversations and forums.
Well, uh, evidently *somebody* thought there was something original or proprietary about it, since he was awarded a patent:Man, is this thread weird... Since the case of Super-T was brought up earlier, what the hell is original or proprietary about anything they produced, except for their pricetag?
Well, uh, evidently *somebody* thought there was something original or proprietary about it, since he was awarded a patent:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week25/OG/html/1403-4/US08757169-20140624.html
Not a patent for a mod.
It's a patent for an "e cigarette REFILLING device".
Did you even bother to click the link you posted?
OMG.
No wonder this thread is so long.
Edited to add:
In fact, it looks like they own the patent for a squonker!
does that make REOs all clones?
lmao
Well, uh, evidently *somebody* thought there was something original or proprietary about it, since he was awarded a patent:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/patents/patog/week25/OG/html/1403-4/US08757169-20140624.html
Those who are new to vaping generally don't start out on mechs and RBA's...
Would you pay $500 for a pair of designer jeans? $300 for a t shirt? $100 for a pencil?
It's the manufacturers prerogative to charge what they want.
But if you charge $250 for a product that can obviously be made and retailed for a fraction of the cost you have made a poor business move and another business will soon pick up your slack, and capitalize on your mistake.
Can't get greedy in an open market. Poor business models and amateurs hyping non existent inventory created the clone monster.
Authentic modders created their own worst enemy.
Sure I've read that document, many times.
The guy asked a question:Lol
Did you hope we wouldn't?
That document has nothing to do with clones or mods.
Why did you think it was relevant?
It's a filling device.... Basically a juice feeder.
Man, is this thread weird... Since the case of Super-T was brought up earlier, what the hell is original or proprietary about anything they produced, except for their pricetag?
The RTA portion of my Kanger sub tank outperforms all of my clones and authentic atties. Pretty soon folks won"t have to buy stupidly overpriced originals - you'll just have to buy a reasonably priced Chinese original.