I know you like to mention KODI and how it's free and chock full of, er, free content .. the thing is, KODI exists in a grey area .. it was originally designed as a open source media center software, used to access YouTube, Netflix, etc and store your paid content on a HTPC (Home Theater PC) and fully legit .. developers have written add ons which allow access to content that KODI was not originally designed to access .. much of it if not most of it in the gray area of legality or even illegal, period ..
prior to retirement, i worked for an anti-piracy company, as Director of Software Engineering. My job was to catch pirated content providers, and i was fairly good at it. We were hired by all the movie/TV content providers mainly.
currently, it is illegal to stream copyrighted content--
as a provider.
in the U.S.
currently, streaming illegally-sourced content
as a consumer is perfectly legal. it is considered "fair use".
this assumes you don't use any peer-to-peer protocols (which require you to actually be a
provider of bits and pieces, making you a
de facto provider)
so,
currently using Kodi (or whatever- even a browser) to access
any content is perfectly legal in the U.S., whether it is
provided legally or not.
Congress is reportedly considering passing a law to make it illegal to
consume illegally
provided content, but they have not done so yet, AFAIK.
And if they do pass the law, companies like the one i used to work for will still be unable to detect streamers. There is no technology that will do that.
However, the movie and TV companies who used to hire companies like mine will
throw tons of money at internet service providers, who will be able to detect streaming consumers.
So, in my case, after the law passes and goes into effect, i'll expect a notification from Comcast, after which i'll reconsider my Kodi/browsing use.
Shades of grey, Willie. Shades of grey