The one that did the back flip was examined, brushed off and flown again 10 minutes later. The one that was in the air already headed into the woods, broke a prop trying to chop up a tree, and crashed, dislodging the battery. I haven't checked yet to make sure it suffered no internal injuries but I'm reasonably confident (hopeful) that replacement of the broken prop is all it needs.Bells, I'm sorry, but I had to laugh at the beginning of the video. To be honest, that's an experiment I would have tried myself. I'd have been out there trying to have one quad taking a video of the other quad.
I would have never thought the two signals would interfere with one another. Glad you stuff wasn't damaged. Now I don't feel so bad about laughing at the back flip
I was surprised too. It's conceivable that the crash of the quad in the air was caused by the back-flipping quad landing on its back on top of the remote control of the airborne quad. Still, that wouldn't explain the failure of the quad on the ground to take off properly, and wouldn't explain the deterioration of the hovering accuracy of the quad that was already flying. You can see that the airborne quad starts to wander some before I try to launch the other one, but that both times I look at it during that time, it holds still as if it didn't want me to see it planning to go nuts.Bells, good video. To bad they cannot fly simultaneously. That would make some interesting vids. Are you sure the signals do not have frequency adjustments? They fly multiple hover craft at hover meets???
On a handful of occasions I have flown two different Phantom quads simultaneously with no difficulty. There's all kinds of things I could try, in an effort to eliminate any signal conflict, and at least one of them would probably work; but I think you can probably understand I'm not in a hurry to try those things.