It was, however, by virtue of Conley gaining Trump's ear and laying out a complex and nuanced position in a few, well-considered, and impactful words that it was possible. I can hardly imagine a more high-risk, stressful, and hostile environment under which to advance one's position. We owe them our deep gratitude.
I agree. And I am grateful. FWIW. I can't imagine how stressful it must have been--knowing that the future of vaping depended on the few words he was allowed to utter in the room full of hostiles who looked like they were ready to eat him alive...
Agreed — njoy played it well.
He's a smart cookie, that CEO. I wonder if Njoy has a predicate device that is not subject to PMTA. And if such a device even exists. But if it does, it undoubtedly consists of a power source (battery), an atomizer of some kind (heating coil and vaporizing chamber), and e-liquids. A good lawyer can then claim that everything on the market today is SE (substantially equivalent) the that predicate device, because it is, really. I think that will be our next battle--claiming exemptions from PMTAs based on SE.