Fixed that for youWe are 20billionTrillion dollars in debt
Fixed that for youWe are 20billionTrillion dollars in debt
That's a narrow view.
The government doesn't run every restaurant or slaughter house yet they make enough money on fines to pay for the inspectors.
Plus the inspections cost the business owner, not the government.
So, as far as cost having to be out of control, I completely disagree.
I don't think it even has any logic let alone merit.
Legislators know they're in no position to set up shop nearly as fast as they want control.
It would no doubt be outsourced to shops that apply for the job in their region.
All the government would have to do is accept someone's outline of the criteria and classwork and issue permits and tell the shops where to buy the material.
Just like getting any other license, the customer would then pay the fees, attend the course and the shop would issue the credentials.
Though, I completely agree our government is too incompetent to leave well enough alone and find a common sense approach that works without over reaching.
And for that, I agree that OUR CURRENT government (and for the foreseeable future) should keep their grubby mitts out of our cookie jar.
But if they could get their hands out of the opposition's pockets, actually protect our best interests and avoid rectal cranial inversion, my proposal is the best I've seen IMHO.
Not that I'm biased or anything. I just happen to know the guy who proposed it... is all.
Tapatyped
Fixed that for you![]()
I look at it much like the election in November: I didn't like either candidate, but one was far preferable to the other. I don't like some of the things in Rep. Hunter's proposed bill, but it's far preferable to leaving vaping under the TCA and current Deeming. So if that's the choice, I'll be happy to see it pass.So, to bring this back to the deeming regs, here's Rep. Hunter's proposed legislation:
https://www.regulatorwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CSREVA115-APR-21-2017-vr..pdf
I think we're 100% on the same page.Every single time in my lifetime that we have left something to government bureaucrats to oversee the cost is always in the millions - If not billions of dollars.
We can sit all day long and put it down on paper that this will be the proposed cost, yet the real cost is always so much higher because government can't manage anything with a modicum of common sense.. they find ways to spend.
As far as our government right now, both sides of the aisle are as devoid of common sense as anyone can get - and I agree,I see no change in THAT anytime soon. It also doesn't bode well in my opinion for them to have common sense when it comes to a program such as an educational course.
I would, however, support it.. I see it as a compromise. It's something I feel would be good..
I think we're 100% on the same page.
I just see it handled more in house at a vape shop like a local slaughterhouse does USDA inspections than the government taking the responsibility like issuing a drivers license.
But hell, even then, the gooberment doesn't provide the education.
Tapatyped
Has this been posted yet?
https://www.tattoovape.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/CSREVA115-APR-21-2017-vr..pdf
Ok, guess I haven't been paying close enough attention.![]()

I particularly like this part.
‘‘SEC. 1006. PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL 13 REQUIREMENTS.
I hope that this pulls the rug out from under these yahoos in California.
I particularly like this part.
‘‘SEC. 1006. PREEMPTION OF CERTAIN STATE AND LOCAL 13 REQUIREMENTS.
I hope that this pulls the rug out from under these yahoos in California.
@Eskie Farmers also grow livestock.
OK, but just how many pet pythons were going after livestock. I get bringing non-native things in can create problems, but even if someone dumped a python outside a farm, what's the likelihood it would meet another python and have baby pythons to invade and unbalance the ecosystem (you do need two snakes to make lots of little snakes, right?)?
I do get the issues that happen with invasive bugs and damage to crops and native flora, and even invasive, non-native tropical fish people will release into the wild (look at puffer fish moving up along the East coast where they're not exactly supposed to be) but invasive snakes is something I am unfamiliar with.
Besides, "save the cow" doesn't have quite the same emotional impact on the public as "save the children".
Have to make sure the shops hire the best to provide that education.. many of these newer shops don't have lots of knowledge.
But I agree.![]()
The chances, while small, does happen, and when it does, there comes a new species in a particular area.
Raising wolves in many areas is illegal (farming wins in most areas) but I rescued a wolf injured from the wild, and simply kept him. He was good, but was always wild. Once he had a touch of blood lust, and killed 75 of my chickens in one day.. he never did it again, as he was in trouble for it and was intelligent, but wild is something you cannot remove from an animal.
He did however, mate with a local coyote that was wild.. something I never realised would happen as it's abnormal behavior.. it's things like that, next thing you know there is a litter of wolf/coyote mixes, all wild.
Things happen, species find a way to go on... farmers don't like it.. losing your small livestock to snakes is already a problem.. snakes and foxes are typical around farms.. it's a daily battle to keep as much of your stock as possible when there are wild animals about.
A six foot dangerous snake bringing a breeding population to an area? Yeah.. farmers will usually win out on a case like that..