Hoo boy. Look. I'm not saying I am in the right, I am just saying all evidence should be examined.
I also do not understand why the idea of isolating 5% and ADDING jobs to care for those people at home is less smart than what is happening now. I am telling you perhaps not in all cities, but in many I have been in recently the "quarantine measures" are a joke. People are not following them.
Go to any grocery store and attempt to maintain a six foot distance the whole time. You might be able to do it if you barricaded your cart at the entrance to the bathroom and stayed in there the whole time, but it makes it rather hard to shop.
I TOO would love to believe in purity of motives and to think all people were good. I too would love to turn on NPR and believe it was speaking truth.
The Ancient Aliens cop out is kind of annoying frankly. Examining all sources and information should be mandatory. I was taught to do it early and often starting in CIVICS in HS where the teacher showed us H Bush's identical AD in which only the words "no new taxes" we removed because he had. SW school taught me those values too. I would not cite anything as possibly factual without verifying it in about 7 independent places.
If 5% of the American people are going to die, they are going to die regardless I promise you that, UNLESS (as some of the smart ones on ECF are ALREADY doing) they are quarantining THEMSELVES, having groceries delivered the whole bit.
IF those truly at risk ALREADY understand they are at risk due to half measures and unenforced security proceures, why are we doing it at all?
If the CDC is so well meaning why is so much of their info inaccurate? Here's one. It's not terrible except for one thing. "Follow up with your doctor within (blank empty space) days????"
https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/aha-patient-opioid-factsheet-a.pdf
Whut? Have there not like been studies on how long it can take to become addicted to opiates? Can I just write 365 days in the blank space and it will be fine?
Oh but LOOK? The CDC actually FUNDED a study on how much time passes from exposure to addiction (keeping in mind every brain is different and more and less vulnerable) and it is reported here and I acknowledge each brain is more or less vulnerable to opiates but so does the study I think.)
CDC study finds opioid dependency begins in the first few days of initial use
So like, should not the CDC trust its own research and at LEAST write 5 days in there?
No only that, IDK the whole thing just isn't great it looks like its target audience is like, Sesame street. Here is a fact sheet that actually makes some sense.
And I am telling you I did not cherry pick this issue other than to consider another recent "health epidemic," one that is highly argued.
So many of them are like this! I could have chosen a vaping one, but that's just preaching to the choir honestly. I mean..... How come the CDC sucks so bad in some regards but is to be universally trusted in others? I'm very confused.
Dang my favorite fact sheet on youth vaping would not post. It was the one that said beware of "suspicious USB drives."
But I swear to god why on EARTH should I be impressed with this agency and its "competence." I am NOT saying the CDC doesn't have a role, potentially it should. IDK. I think anyone indicating other research should just be IGNORED (including from other countries) is the one wearing the tinfoil hat, personally.
Yes people make mistakes, studies can appear useful and found not to be later. Look at every menopausal who took estrogen to reduce menopause symptoms. Early studies said it reduced the risk of heart attacks until a lengthy study found it INCREASED them, the cofounding factor being women taking estrogen for menopause took better care of their health in general.
If you don't think politics and rhetoric are playing a role in this well look I'm sorry. 5% of a population is NOT a pandemic, I'm sorry. The percentage isn't high enough. It just isn't, although I just now read a BUNCH of information on pandemic vs. epidemic and when it came to actual NUMBERS involved they were pretty dang shady which does not surprise me even slightly. as they were published after COVID.
It COULD I guess be considered a pandemic NOW in the US as it is affecting everyone. We could have isolated and taken care of the vulnerable, creating MORE jobs and letting us go about our business. I am SURE that idea HAD to have been discussed at some point by epidemiologists but I think I have done ENOUGH research for this post.
And yes those of you who disagree are welcome to tell me how lovely the US government is, how kind and trustworthy etc. Start from colonization times and tell me how well the people who "owned" this country were treated, although "ownership" wasn't exactly even a concept for them. Tell me ALL about how and why I should trust my government because I would actually LOVE to do so,
This is my last post on the matter other than to say, if the CDC is like this I don't see trusting the FDA either.
Anna