Ecigs have been banned?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Leatherneck

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 7, 2013
689
853
Oregon
Or if they were to confirm liquids leeching plastics and made glass bottle the standard.

My concern is that the government goes WAYYY overboard, especially when you don't follow their agenda. I do not believe that to be accidental. To elaborate on your example, they'll start off with just glass. Then it has to be a special type of glass. Then it has to be molded in a certain format. Oh, and it has to have this labelling on it. And it has to have this kind of seal.

And before too long, what started out as a reasonable thing has mushroomed into the realm of stupidity and over-regulation, and we end up suffering for it at the hands of unelected buffoons.
 

DC2

Tootie Puffer
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jun 21, 2009
24,161
40,974
San Diego
I'm really not OK with a bunch of taxing or licensing, but I'm not naive enough to think it won't happen. I would like to believe the more noise we make MAY just keep the FDA from running rough shod over us completely.
What he said...

And to the original poster, do you consider a limitation of 4mg strength to be an issue?
Do you consider the elimination of flavors to be an issue?

These are two things that could render electronic cigarettes nothing more than a novelty.
And for those that have followed the FDA's position towards electronic cigarettes for years now, they seem fairly likely.
 

Wondertwin

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 4, 2012
335
480
Texas
My concern is that the government goes WAYYY overboard, especially when you don't follow their agenda. I do not believe that to be accidental. To elaborate on your example, they'll start off with just glass. Then it has to be a special type of glass. Then it has to be molded in a certain format. Oh, and it has to have this labelling on it. And it has to have this kind of seal.

And before too long, what started out as a reasonable thing has mushroomed into the realm of stupidity and over-regulation, and we end up suffering for it at the hands of unelected buffoons.

Yup, I agree. I had to think long and hard about FDA regulation compromise to even get what I got for those reasons! If there was proof of current methods being harmful, and no self regulation, the FDA would have cheerleaders for cleaning up a mess. As it exists currently though, nothing to see here, move along...oh but wait, there's money in it. Regulate away please :(
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
I am not trying to call anybody stupid and I am not trying to be anybody's white knight. I am sorry if it comes across that way. It's just in the month or so I have been on ECF I have come to expect more. I thought your original post was a good post. However this thread as a whole saddened and angered me. I did somehow miss the long and eloquent post on page 9. I couldn't get past page 6 or 7 without the urge to post my thoughts. I did go back through and read after that and still missed it. One post still didn't change the first several pages of bashing the OP.

It's okay worthatry. From everything I had heard about ECF, I felt it better than 50/50 that my OP message would garner some bashing and calling me out. (I bet he's not even a vaper. LOL) Of all the forums I've been on, all the heated online discussions I've seen or participated in, this is very tame and more on the humorous side of things than the emotionally gut wrenching disparaging remarks - side of things.

I've got over 2000 posts on another vaping forum and asking similar question(s) to the one in OP. De facto banning and the implications that come from that addresses what I was certainly getting at in the original message. But as I see things, they got the guns, but we got the numbers and we're taking over. Or something like that. My optimism for the future of vaping does include a bump or two in the road. Some of those bumps may be perceived as huge or akin to the size of a good old fashioned sink hole. With all that said, I think we're going to be fine.
 

Hulamoon

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2012
8,636
43,384
66
Waikiki Hawaii
IMO it should be as simple as this. The FDA ain't gonna ban cigarettes, which contain nicotine, MOAI's, arsenic etc ad nauseum. They will not ban PG which is used in asthma inhalers among many other things and VG which is universal. So why do they feel they need to get involved in banning or regulating e-cig equipment and juice? The answer is BT and BP. Nothing else.
 

tA71ana

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 26, 2012
1,243
2,531
Round N Round the Mulberry Bush
If the Chinese are indeed making the Blu batts (I'm sure that they are, it all comes from there), they may not want to upset the Chinese over the larger form factor mods, etc.or they may not get their cig-sized batts either.
Not good to upset the applecart...Blu (and potentially other BT cos.) have sunk a lot of money into ecigs
 

Jman8

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Jan 15, 2013
6,419
12,928
Wisconsin
And to the original poster, do you consider a limitation of 4mg strength to be an issue?
Do you consider the elimination of flavors to be an issue?

These are two things that could render electronic cigarettes nothing more than a novelty.
And for those that have followed the FDA's position towards electronic cigarettes for years now, they seem fairly likely.

I think limiting eliquids to anything under 24mg, is an issue to contest.
As stated before, I think the flavors thing is significant issue. I welcome the debate from the other side on that particular point. While the thrust of that point stems from a consideration that I think is well intended, it so far shows up to me as something along lines of asinine.
 

Leatherneck

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Jan 7, 2013
689
853
Oregon
I forgot to add, I'd be okay with only American made products as well. If they want to limit us in that fashion, my vendor list is safe!

I'd come out of such an embargo pretty ok. When I posted on Facebook that I was quitting and how, it turns out a friend's spouse makes mods. The companies I buy from are US. I'm not too sure about the companies they buy from however.
 

tA71ana

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 26, 2012
1,243
2,531
Round N Round the Mulberry Bush
I forgot to add, I'd be okay with only American made products as well. If they want to limit us in that fashion, my vendor list is safe!

On the one hand I can see your point.
On the other hand, much is made about the concept of 'Free Enterprise' in the US..that includes buying something made out of country if one chooses. If I can buy a pair of Chanel shoes that were made in France then I should also be able to but an ecig from overseas if I want to as well :D
 

tartanraven

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Nov 12, 2012
783
1,260
St. Louis, MO
Your Comment Tracking Number: 1jx-834o-a7hd THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING THE FDA CAN DO TO TAX PAYERS I AM SO ...... THEY CAN BE BULLIED BY LOBBYIST TO GET THEM O PROPOSE SUCH BULLSHT TO CONGRESS>>> HELP US NOT HURT US >> POT YOUR COMMENTS NOW!!
Rage caps!! GRRRR..FEEL THE FURY!
When your seethe is over...might want to read the rules regarding profanity and implied profanity.
 

tA71ana

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 26, 2012
1,243
2,531
Round N Round the Mulberry Bush
Your Comment Tracking Number: 1jx-834o-a7hd THIS IS THE STUPIDEST THING THE FDA CAN DO TO TAX PAYERS I AM SO ...... THEY CAN BE BULLIED BY LOBBYIST TO GET THEM O PROPOSE SUCH BULLSHT TO CONGRESS>>> HELP US NOT HURT US >> POT YOUR COMMENTS NOW!!

Oh my...you might want to watch your language, lol
This isn't Yahoo
 

Wondertwin

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Apr 4, 2012
335
480
Texas
On the one hand I can see your point.
On the other hand, much is made about the concept of 'Free Enterprise' in the US..that includes buying something made out of country if one chooses. If I can buy a pair of Chanel shoes that were made in France then I should also be able to but an ecig from overseas if I want to as well :D

For sure, I agree. I'm listing stuff I could live with in the spirit of regulation compromise. I just threw up in my mouth a little. Speaking of Chanel though, those .......s took the original nail polish "Vamp" and renamed it "Rouge Noir" then made it only available in Europe. I feel no pity for them! That felt good :p

I'd come out of such an embargo pretty ok. When I posted on Facebook that I was quitting and how, it turns out a friend's spouse makes mods. The companies I buy from are US. I'm not too sure about the companies they buy from however.

Fair point, but I bet we'd get a work around quick!
 

2coils

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2012
1,504
2,500
New Jersey
FDA goal (IMO) is to get society / individuals away from the addiction, and perhaps even moderate use, of nicotine; and therefore the 'harmful / deadly product of tobacco consumption.'

If this were the case why are cigaretts so readily accessable??? This agenda against e-cigs is nothing but political. The FDA and govt need to keep certain people wealthy.
 

Sunshinefl8788

Super Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Oct 13, 2012
418
473
Florida
IMO it should be as simple as this. The FDA ain't gonna ban cigarettes, which contain nicotine, MOAI's, arsenic etc ad nauseum. They will not ban PG which is used in asthma inhalers among many other things and VG which is universal. So why do they feel they need to get involved in banning or regulating e-cig equipment and juice? The answer is BT and BP. Nothing else.

I am right with you! I don't understand the whole "regulate" thing...they allow cigarettes KNOWING they are FULL of cancer causing agents...all the while pretending to be the white knights that will save us from e liquids! I could handle the glass bottles being a must, but even then I don't get it! WHY worry about protecting us from plastic leeching, while smokers are consuming thousands of chemicals? We all know it won't stop at glass bottles and minor changes, it will go on to regulate e-cigs/liquids to death!!
 

2coils

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Nov 29, 2012
1,504
2,500
New Jersey
And lets not forget we have states saying its ok to smoke pot. Our President has said... the people of these states have spoken.....suggesting to me that its not really a huge deal. Lets get real.... nobody is worried about the children in these particular states? Yet God for bid we have vapers!!! Peoples priorities are shot. Affirming its all about the money!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread