No one is implying anything.
If you look at the output of the Provari, MVP 2 and the vv3 on the scope it looks like flat DC. How that is achieved, is really irrelevant.
PWM is used in boost circuits to increase the voltage output of a fixed DC source. In the case of the less inexpensive mods, this is done at 33hz or 48hz and it is both visible on a scope, audible, and some people claim detectable in the vape.
On the MVP 2, VV3, and ProVari, either the PWM is occurring at such a high rate that it appears flat on a scope, or there is additional filtering done on the output signal to flatten it out. However it's done is not the issue.
Bottom line, when you put an MVP, VV3, and ProVari on a scope they look identical. And if precision electronic measuring equipment can't tell the difference, neither than our less calibrated bodies.....
I understand all of this. What I don't understand is how the information has been collected regarding the provari's 800 hz and the evic's 100 hz.
Whatever method was used determining that should be able to collect the MVP 2 output frequency.
The main reason I have brought this up, is to have ammo for the provari pimps. To many threads by new capers asking about upgrades are filled with "get a provari" as the answer.
The more data that can be shown that the MVP 2 is not that much different spec wise is a win. Especially when the MVP 2 can be had at a fourth the cost of the provari.
Sent from my Nokia Lumia 920 using Tapatalk