"You haven't really quit, because you're still inhaling nicotine and acting like you're smoking."
You mean that I haven't really quit nicotine then, not that I haven't quit smoking. Because I've obviously quit smoking since I no longer inhale smoke. So what's more important? To quit smoking or to quit nicotine?
"But nicotine causes (cancer, heart disease.)"
No, it doesn't. That is a myth. Nicotine keeps people smoking, which causes smoking-related diseases. They are called "smoking-related diseases" not "nicotine-related diseases." Doctors want people to quit nicotine so they will quit smoking. If nicotine didn't keep people smoking, doctors wouldn't have any more of a problem with it than they do caffeine.
"But you're still addicted."
Maybe. Either way, at least now I won't get smoking-related diseases because of it.
"But don't you want to be free from addiction?"
It doesn't bother me so long as it won't kill me. Millions of people are just as addicted to caffeine, but no one has a problem with it because it's pretty harmless. I enjoy vaping like other people enjoy coffee, so what's the difference as long as there are little to no health risks? If they don't have to quit caffeine, why should I have to quit nicotine?
"Nicotine is more addictive than caffeine. It's more addictive than her-oin!"
Another myth started by anti-tobacco people with absolutely no scientific basis. There is not one scientific study showing that to be true - just try to find one. In one breath they say it's so horribly addictive and in the next they justify smoking bans by saying smokers should be able to go hours without a cigarette out of courtesy for non-smokers. So which is it?
"If you're going to smoke, why not just smoke the real thing?"
Because I don't want increase my risk of cancer or heart disease, thank you.
"It looks stupid."
So do safety goggles, bicycle helmets and hazmat suits, but does that mean we shouldn't use them? And now I get to look stupid inside a warm building instead of standing outside in the cold and rain.
You mean that I haven't really quit nicotine then, not that I haven't quit smoking. Because I've obviously quit smoking since I no longer inhale smoke. So what's more important? To quit smoking or to quit nicotine?
"But nicotine causes (cancer, heart disease.)"
No, it doesn't. That is a myth. Nicotine keeps people smoking, which causes smoking-related diseases. They are called "smoking-related diseases" not "nicotine-related diseases." Doctors want people to quit nicotine so they will quit smoking. If nicotine didn't keep people smoking, doctors wouldn't have any more of a problem with it than they do caffeine.
"But you're still addicted."
Maybe. Either way, at least now I won't get smoking-related diseases because of it.
"But don't you want to be free from addiction?"
It doesn't bother me so long as it won't kill me. Millions of people are just as addicted to caffeine, but no one has a problem with it because it's pretty harmless. I enjoy vaping like other people enjoy coffee, so what's the difference as long as there are little to no health risks? If they don't have to quit caffeine, why should I have to quit nicotine?
"Nicotine is more addictive than caffeine. It's more addictive than her-oin!"
Another myth started by anti-tobacco people with absolutely no scientific basis. There is not one scientific study showing that to be true - just try to find one. In one breath they say it's so horribly addictive and in the next they justify smoking bans by saying smokers should be able to go hours without a cigarette out of courtesy for non-smokers. So which is it?
"If you're going to smoke, why not just smoke the real thing?"
Because I don't want increase my risk of cancer or heart disease, thank you.
"It looks stupid."
So do safety goggles, bicycle helmets and hazmat suits, but does that mean we shouldn't use them? And now I get to look stupid inside a warm building instead of standing outside in the cold and rain.
Last edited: