Really going to be lame if the battery dies, and you have to ship it off or bust out a soldering iron. Other then that a solid design.
While I see how some people may be concerned about this, as others have posted and we are all accustomed to swapping batts, this was the same argument posted when iphone launched. We all know how that turned out - still one of the hottest phones made and with multi-millions units sales anticipations at VZW (4 models later - ALL requiring Apple to change the batts).Really going to be lame if the battery dies, and you have to ship it off or bust out a soldering iron. Other then that a solid design.
I'm hoping Darwin is easier to stealth than my trusty saber.
Why they would design it with batteries like this is a major flaw.
Issue is not paying for the battery, its the fact that a PV you really enjoy dies on you and you can do nothing about it. It is why we all stock extra batterys and cartomizers and atomizers and sometimes switches for our favorite units. No one wants to be stuck suckin on an old ego after they have had the joys of a regulated VV. Why they would design it with batteries like this is a major flaw.
Well, good luck with that. Provari wins again.
Well, good luck with that. Provari wins again.
I suppose it comes down to personal preference, but if given the choice between the LiPo cells the Darwin is using and a functionally identical model that used prismatic LiIon cells, I'd still want the LiPos. There's a reason that laptops are moving away from prismatic cells and toward flat LiPos. LiPo cells have better energy-to-weight/volume ratios, as well as higher discharge capabilities. If you only need to change the batteries once a year (at most), then does it really matter how difficult it is? It'll take 10 minutes to do the swap if you're slow. And in exchange for those 10 minutes, you get to spend the rest of the year using a better PV.
I've pretty much decided to get a darwin as soon as a less caustic retailer has some in stock. $220 is a lot of money, but it's technically the best PV you can buy right now for any price.
there's one more unique benefit of the 3rd gen. PV; the Darwin;
thanks candre.
when you invest big time and money to produce a new upscale pv, it better be good or it will be shot down fast on forum.
I like these categories but I might consider one minor change. I think I might consider non-PCB variable voltage devices as 4th generation and PCB devices as 5th generation.Eh, you mean FOURTH gen....
1st gen: original e-cigs such as the 510, rn4081, 901, 801, etc. Pen or analog looking devices.
2nd gen: big battery mods used to overcome the biggest shortcoming of the prior generation, suck-batteries. Screwdriver, Chuck, GGTS, and a whole bunch of others.
3rd gen: self juicing mods, vapes that can juice a carto or atty from their own enclosed liquid supply...Carlos Juice Box, Ali, Phidimus, Reo, etc.
IMHO, a mod that uses anything other than the battery itself to regulate or alter the flow of current is a 4th generation device.
If you ask, how do we distinguish between 4th gen mods that juice themselves from the ones that don't, that's a good question. 4+? 4J? 4+3?