Who here is not stocking up in preparation for the May 12th, 2020 Deadline?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Don29palms

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2014
4,162
14,595
joshua tree, ca
Well if you tell other people about your stash, and your stash happens to be over what state considers amount for personal use, that could lead to them wanting to investigate your house, for the stash. It would be legally challenging for them, but given an atmosphere against vaping, it could be demanded by the public.

To be clear, I really hope it doesn't happen.



They wouldn't need extra law enforcement. It would get ridiculous if they tried to go after everyone. If that's what anyone is taking away from what I'm conveying, I'm sorry, but you've been misinterpreting what I'm saying and/or see happening. One or two busts locally would be enough to change a whole lot of minds with regards to how people go about revealing themselves as a vaper, that is stocked up.

(If Don29palms agrees with everything I've said here, please put up a red x. Thank you.)
Keep on proving you have no clue. There is no laws against owning any amount of ejuice. I will say it a different way. Maybe you need to have someone that does have a clue explain how things work.
 

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,586
35,803
Naptown, Indiana
Even if the Indiana law would have passed it wouldn't have prevented DIY for personal use. It would have made it illegal to sell or manufacture for sale.

Not that it matters but I believe the Indiana law was theoretically in effect for a short period of time. It was already in trouble by then and was quietly withdrawn. It was enough to cause a bunch of vaping shops to close down in anticipation though. And some juice vendors stopped shipping here for a while.

It was fairly clear in the law that mixing juice for your own consumption with legally obtained ingredients was fine.

There was one interesting wrinkle that I never understood. During the period when vendors wouldn't ship juice to Indiana I contacted my nic vendor and asked if they were affected, they replied that it didn't impact them. I picked up a liter just because.
 

Don29palms

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2014
4,162
14,595
joshua tree, ca
Not that it matters but I believe the Indiana law was theoretically in effect for a short period of time. It was already in trouble by then and was quietly withdrawn. It was enough to cause a bunch of vaping shops to close down in anticipation though. And some juice vendors stopped shipping here for a while.

It was fairly clear in the law that mixing juice for your own consumption with legally obtained ingredients was fine.

There was one interesting wrinkle that I never understood. During the period when vendors wouldn't ship juice to Indiana I contacted my nic vendor and asked if they were affected, they replied that it didn't impact them. I picked up a liter just because.
That's horrible. Hopefully the shop owners didn't lose everything.
 

Brewdawg1181

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 30, 2017
3,910
14,716
Metro ATL
Oops.
Meant to pop in on the "Who here is not stocking up" thread.
Don't know how I ended up on the "THEY'RE COMING AFTER YOUR PERSONAL STASH!!! (and random opinions on what constitutes a black market)" thread. Again.


<leaves, mumbling something about Dunning-Kruger effect being way too real>
 

englishmick

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Sep 25, 2014
6,586
35,803
Naptown, Indiana
That's horrible. Hopefully the shop owners didn't lose everything.

I'm pretty sure a bunch closed down but it's been a long time. I saved the link to a long article in the Indiana Business Journal about the whole mess.

E-cigarette players fume over favored security firm - Indianapolis Business Journal

Only one shop is mentioned by name. The owner said he was planning to close down, but right after this the law was withdrawn. I googled the name and it appears to still be operating.

The main problem for shops was that the 4 approved juice makers in Indiana were going to be charging shops significantly more for juice, to cover the expenses of complying with the law. And because they had a monopoly so they could. Plus they would lose access to all the recognized national juice names that people were used to buying.
 

Don29palms

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Sep 12, 2014
4,162
14,595
joshua tree, ca
I'm pretty sure a bunch closed down but it's been a long time. I saved the link to a long article in the Indiana Business Journal about the whole mess.

E-cigarette players fume over favored security firm - Indianapolis Business Journal

Only one shop is mentioned by name. The owner said he was planning to close down, but right after this the law was withdrawn. I googled the name and it appears to still be operating.

The main problem for shops was that the 4 approved juice makers in Indiana were going to be charging shops significantly more for juice, to cover the expenses of complying with the law. And because they had a monopoly so they could. Plus they would lose access to all the recognized national juice names that people were used to buying.
This is just more proof that when government gets involved with anything it never turns out well. When taxes and fees become to high the business closes and all the taxes and fees are lost.
 

Horselady154

Ultra Member
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
Jan 15, 2013
1,535
4,285
United States
You keep insisting on proving you have no clue what you're talking about. The law was about SALES.
There was no personal attacks. Facts are not personal. They are just facts.
Then argue the point. Stop it with the personal attacks, Don. Sheesh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jman8

dripster

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2017
1,559
2,376
Belgium
There are laws against selling some vape products, but currently no law against owning any. And as I said, this hasn't even been proposed by anyone. Ever.
This proposed regulation furthers this legislative objective by prohibiting the possession, manufacture, distribution, sale or offer for sale of flavored electronicliquids (e-liquids) to discourage electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use.

(Emphasis in bold is mine.)

Source: https://docs.dos.ny.gov/info/register/2018/november7/rulemaking.pdf

:danger:
 

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
This proposed regulation furthers this legislative objective by prohibiting the possession, manufacture, distribution, sale or offer for sale of flavored electronicliquids (e-liquids) to discourage electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use.

(Emphasis in bold is mine.)

Source: https://docs.dos.ny.gov/info/register/2018/november7/rulemaking.pdf

:danger:

Rules and regulations are easy to propose, especially on a state level. Passing them is another story. That one in particular has as much chance of being enacted as my getting a free trip to Mars on Musk's dime. Or a paid for all inclusive weekend in the Caribbean with Grimes. And a free Tesla. (if forced to choose, obviously I'll take the weekend with Grimes and the Tesla, who wants to go to some dusty planet).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Don29palms

dripster

Moved On
ECF Veteran
Feb 18, 2017
1,559
2,376
Belgium
Rules and regulations are easy to propose, especially on a state level. Passing them is another story. That one in particular has as much chance of being enacted as my getting a free trip to Mars on Musk's dime. Or a paid for all inclusive weekend in the Caribbean with Grimes. And a free Tesla. (if forced to choose, obviously I'll take the weekend with Grimes and the Tesla, who wants to go to some dusty planet).
I never said it could be enacted. Rather, because I am a realist, I just debunked the false claim of it having never been proposed by anyone, as this is nevertheless relevant to the discussion about why some vapers aren't stocking up.
 

Punk In Drublic

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 28, 2018
4,194
17,518
Toronto, ON
The thing is VG and PG and flavors are used in so many other applications. I use them for other things all the time. And nic is a pesticide too.

True. But water, corn, malted barley, yeast and even a still are also used for other purposes and can be legally acquired. But used together to make moonshine without a licence is illegal.

VG/PG and flavourings are used in other industries. Any regulations slap onto these products would most likely cause an uproar from those other industries. So probably not wise to regulate or licence these individual ingredients.

Nicotine is used in the pharmaceutical industry which will have its own set of regulations and licences. Wiki states nicotine pesticides have not been commercially available in the US since 2014. Foods imported from countries that allow nic pesticides are subjected to testing to ensure they comply to US regulations.

I have not been able to find any industry that uses nicotine in the processed form of a VG/PG base outside of vaping. If that is the case, then that finished product of nicotine can be regulated, licensed or even banned without affecting any other industry.

Canada and the EU have regulated this processed nicotine product. I am sure the US have looked into what other countries have done and possibly taking their actions under consideration.
 

Eskie

ECF Guru
ECF Veteran
Verified Member
May 6, 2016
16,087
77,744
NY
The concern from the very beginning back in 2016 would be how easy it would be to require a license to purchase any nic solution of greater than x mg/ml with the assumption only the higher amounts would be used in industry (which won’t exist, but whatever) and not for retail sale. It’s already done for bulk alcohol purchases. You can’t just order up a tanker truck of 98% ethanol without a license.

How that’s not happened to date surprises me, but if and when it does I won’t be. It’s the natural choke point for DIY, which is why there’s more nic than food in my freezer. If it never happens, well, for $200 it still won’t go to waste when I use it for mixing anyway.
 

Brewdawg1181

Vaping Master
ECF Veteran
Aug 30, 2017
3,910
14,716
Metro ATL
This proposed regulation furthers this legislative objective by prohibiting the possession, manufacture, distribution, sale or offer for sale of flavored electronicliquids (e-liquids) to discourage electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use.

(Emphasis in bold is mine.)

Source: https://docs.dos.ny.gov/info/register/2018/november7/rulemaking.pdf

:danger:
I hate to further this line in the thread, but guess I have to issue a mea culpa. True, enough, I misstated that, thinking only nationally. Of course I didn't search every state & municipality that exists, but should've said that it's not being contemplated at the federal level.

Still, that's just a nit...the larger point is still valid. Personal stashes are, and will be safe. And even if something like that passed in NY, I don't believe for a second that anyone stashing (not selling) would ever be at risk. Which is the whole point. This thread is not (or wasn't, anyway) about becoming a black market seller.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread