if in fact non
tobacco users show no dependency to nicotine all the
ensnaring new addicts politics goes out the window regardless from
which camp its coming from.
new users starting with
vaping becomes a non-issue. its off the
table. this is very important as it removes one the key arguments
being used against us vapers in the ANTZ's crusade to regulate
and tax us like smokers.

regards
mike
I would say this is the foundational argument for ANTZ, that nicotine is highly addictive. And it is a meme that our side doesn't readily dispute. Like, if ANTZ says only kids would appeal to certain flavors, we readily dispute that. But the nicotine is highly addictive claim is one we are often like, 'yeah, you nailed me on that one.'
IMO, you have to want to be a somewhat regular user to become addicted. And even then, when compared to most other addictions the degree of harm/problems seem very low. Not so low if everything ANTZ says is true, and extremely low if everything ANTZ says is a lie.
One puff is not all it takes to develop this dependence. Likely 10 puffs and it would be not addicted. But to go from zero puffs to 10 puffs takes choice(s). And arguably, not real simple choices. I'm guessing most people that smoke, on first (real) puff are coughing a little, to a lot. Their decision for a second puff is not because nicotine is addictive, but because despite coughing fit they just experienced, they are still curious enough to pursue what is so appealing about this. And to deny this within the equation is IMO, to believe a whole bunch of ANTZ rhetoric regarding 'nicotine' and 'addiction.'
Moreover, many hard core smokers who may readily claim dependence are making a whole bunch of choices daily around their use of cigarettes, and choosing moments where whatever else is going on (i.e. work) is more important than feeding their (alleged) dependence. Hard core vapers, in both my experience and the abundance of data I find online, make similar choices and often it seems far easier than what the average smoker is experiencing. I think most hard core vapers would say the shopping addiction (for vape stuff) is way higher than the nicotine addiction that they may, or may not, experience.
And we already know that if they can tax the heck out of items that contain zero nicotine, like literally almost all of our devices, that they will. Thus, not really really about the addiction aspect, but about using that as a ploy to justify, hopefully without question, the move to higher taxation on this specific set of goods, for the public good.